The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials

Abstract

BackgroundAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders in childhood. A wide variety of treatments have been used for the management of ADHD. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological, psychological and complementary and alternative medicine interventions for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.Methods and findingsWe performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Randomised controlled trials (≥ 3 weeks follow-up) were identified from published and unpublished sources through searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (up to April 7, 2016). Interventions of interest were pharmacological (stimulants, non-stimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and other unlicensed drugs), psychological (behavioural, cognitive training and neurofeedback) and complementary and alternative medicine (dietary therapy, fatty acids, amino acids, minerals, herbal therapy, homeopathy, and physical activity). The primary outcomes were efficacy (treatment response) and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). Secondary outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), as well as serious adverse events and specific adverse events. Random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to obtain estimates as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credibility intervals. We analysed interventions by class and individually. 190 randomised trials (52 different interventions grouped in 32 therapeutic classes) that enrolled 26114 participants with ADHD were included in complex networks. At the class level, behavioural therapy (alone or in combination with stimulants), stimulants, and non-stimulant seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo. Behavioural therapy in combination with stimulants seemed superior to stimulants or non-stimulants. Stimulants seemed superior to behavioural therapy, cognitive training and non-stimulants. Behavioural therapy, stimulants and their combination showed the best profile of acceptability. Stimulants and non-stimulants seemed well tolerated. Among medications, methylphenidate, amphetamine, atomoxetine, guanfacine and clonidine seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo. Methylphenidate and amphetamine seemed more efficacious than atomoxetine and guanfacine. Methylphenidate and clonidine seemed better accepted than placebo and atomoxetine. Most of the efficacious pharmacological treatments were associated with harms (anorexia, weight loss and insomnia), but an increased risk of serious adverse events was not observed. There is lack of evidence for cognitive training, neurofeedback, antidepressants, antipsychotics, dietary therapy, fatty acids, and other complementary and alternative medicine. Overall findings were limited by the clinical and methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes of trials, short-term follow-up, and the absence of high-quality evidence; consequently, results should be interpreted with caution.ConclusionsClinical differences may exist between the ph...

Safety of 80 antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti‐attention‐deficit/hyperactivity medications and mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: a large scale systematic meta‐review of 78 adverse effects

“…For antidepressants, we included four NMAs 40,48‐50 , 15 MAs 36,51‐64 , 27 individual RCTs 65‐91 also covered in those NMA/MAs, six additional RCTs 92‐97 , and three cohort studies 98‐100 . There were 120,637 youth on antidepressants, including 24,659 across 139 RCTs after eliminating duplicated RCTs in multiple NMA/MAs (22,704 in NMA/MAs, 1,955 in additional RCTs), and 95,978 in three cohort studies.…”

School‐based interventions for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review with multiple synthesis methods

“…Non-pharmacological treatments have been implemented and researched in school, home and clinical settings (Sonuga-Barke et al, 2013;Bikic et al, 2017;Catala-Lopez et al, 2017). It could be argued that non-pharmacological treatments for ADHD delivered in any setting may have impacts on outcomes relevant to school.…”

Limited evidence for non-drug treatment of childhood ADHD

“…However, there is a lack of good quality evidence for the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments 2. This systematic review was limited by the small size of the included studies, and variation in outcome measures.…”