2004
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phase diagram of the multi-dimensional Anderson localization via analytic determination of Lyapunov exponents

Abstract: The method proposed by the present authors to deal analytically with the problem of Anderson localization via disorder [J.Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 13777] is generalized for higher spatial dimensions D. In this way the generalized Lyapunov exponents for diagonal correlators of the wave function, ψ 2 n,m , can be calculated analytically and exactly. This permits to determine the phase diagram of the system. For all dimensions D > 2 one finds intervals in the energy and the disorder where extended and lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
114
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, this is nothing but a generalization of our dispute on phase transitions [2][3][4][5][6] for the case of an external magnetic field. We demonstrate below that the model can be exactly solved using the analytical approach [2][3][4] for a certain range of magnitude of the control parameter (magnetic flux). As a result, the generally-accepted viewpoint on the metal-insulator transitions should be revised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, this is nothing but a generalization of our dispute on phase transitions [2][3][4][5][6] for the case of an external magnetic field. We demonstrate below that the model can be exactly solved using the analytical approach [2][3][4] for a certain range of magnitude of the control parameter (magnetic flux). As a result, the generally-accepted viewpoint on the metal-insulator transitions should be revised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is why the magnetic field problem solution requires a generalization of the mathematical formalism [2][3][4][5], to be discussed below.…”
Section: Main Definitions 21 the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations