The phase problem of X-ray crystallography

Abstract

The electron density function of p ( r ) in a crystal determines its diffraction pattern, that is, both the magnitudes and phases of its x-ray diffraction maxima, and conversely. If, however, as is always the case, only magnitudes are available from the diffraction experiment, then the density function p ( r ) cannot be recovered. If one invokes prior structural knowledge, usually that the crystal is composed of discrete atoms of known atomic numbers, then the observed magnitudes are, in general, sufficient to determine the positions of the atoms, that is, the crystal structure.The intensities of a sufficient number of x-ray diffraction maxima determine the structure of a crystal. The available intensities usually exceed the number of parameters needed to describe the structure. From these intensities a set of members lEHl can be derived, one corresponding to each intensity. However, the elucidation of the crystal structure also requires a knowledge of the complex numbers EH =IEHI exp(i$,), the normalized structure factors, of which only the magnitudes lEHl can be determined from experiment. Thus, a 'phase' 4M, unobtainable from the diffraction experiment, must be assigned to each IEHI, and the problem of determining the phases when only the magnitudes IEH1 are known is called 'the phase problem'. Owing to the known atomicity of crystal structures and the redundancy of observed magnitudes lEHI, the phase problem is solvable in principle.

Computationally connecting organic photovoltaic performance to atomistic arrangements and bulk morphology

“…These techniques measure the intensity of radiation scattered by a material as a function of the radiation's incident angle allowing determination of structural correlations within the material. The shortcoming of scattering techniques is that the scattering intensities are not unique-multiple arrangements of atoms can result in the same scattering pattern [61]. This is true whether the incident radiation is scattered by electron clouds (e.g., X-rays) or atomic nuclei (neutrons).…”

“…The scattered intensities provide insight into the length scales of spatial correlations in a material, but these correlations are averaged over relatively large sample volumes, often masking non-negligible structural features [62]. Unfortunately, because of the scattering uniqueness problem, it is not generally possible to deconvolve a scattering pattern into atomic coordinates without additional information [61]. Therefore, the ability compare simulated structures against experimental ones depends on the ability to transform atomic coordinates into scattering patterns.…”

Imaging electronic quantum motion with light

“…Procedures exist, for both crystalline (6) and non-crystalline samples (7), to reconstruct ρðxÞ from the scattering pattern. Equation 1 can be obtained from a purely classical description of electromagnetic radiation scattered by a stationary electron density (5), yielding a result identical to that obtained from a quantum electrodynamics (QED) description of light.…”

Phase determination in spin-polarized neutron specular reflectometry by using a magnetic substrate

“…The measurement of the specularly reflected intensity in term of the wave number q perpendicular to the sample surface provides important information on the atomic or magnetic scattering length density (SLD) profile of the nanostructure materials along their depth x [3]. However, extracting the profile from the measured reflectivity R(q), as a function of q, has been hampered by the so called phase problem [4,5]. This problem refers to the loss of the phase of reflection coefficient in any scattering problem.…”