2017
DOI: 10.4103/joah.joah_27_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pheno-genotypic characteristics of infantile acute leukemia in a regional cancer center from South India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are comparable to the to the results of De Braekeleer et al, study, which showed that t(12;21) (p13;q21) was the most frequent structural rearrangements in children with B ALL even though t(9;22) (q34;q11) was the most frequent structural rearrangements among adults with B-ALL. 14 In contrast to this study, the low frequency of translocation t(12;21)TEL/AML1 among B ALL patients (Table 3) was observed by Arash et al, and Chebihi et al 12,15 In this study MLL(KMT2A) Gene Rearrangement was the most commonly found molecular aberration in infantile B ALL which is comparable to the study done by Vijayanarasimha et al 5 Few limitations of this study are, Karyotyping and translocation t(1;19) were not performed. Karyotyping might have helped to detect few other abnormalities like Hyper diploidy and Hypodiploidy which have prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These results are comparable to the to the results of De Braekeleer et al, study, which showed that t(12;21) (p13;q21) was the most frequent structural rearrangements in children with B ALL even though t(9;22) (q34;q11) was the most frequent structural rearrangements among adults with B-ALL. 14 In contrast to this study, the low frequency of translocation t(12;21)TEL/AML1 among B ALL patients (Table 3) was observed by Arash et al, and Chebihi et al 12,15 In this study MLL(KMT2A) Gene Rearrangement was the most commonly found molecular aberration in infantile B ALL which is comparable to the study done by Vijayanarasimha et al 5 Few limitations of this study are, Karyotyping and translocation t(1;19) were not performed. Karyotyping might have helped to detect few other abnormalities like Hyper diploidy and Hypodiploidy which have prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%