1998
DOI: 10.2307/1773428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Phenomenological Allegory: From "Death and the Labyrinth" to "The Order of Things"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) For a totally different interpretation of Foucault's interest in the work of Blanchot and Roussel, providing a``hiding place of a cryptic phenomenology'', see Rajan (1988). studies, The Order of Things and The Archaeology of Knowledge (Foucault, 19701972[1969; see Deleuze, 1988;Dreyfus and Rabinow, 1982) but I want to make a more general point here linking Roussel to Foucault's wider archaeological approach that runs throughout his work.…”
Section: The Spaces Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) For a totally different interpretation of Foucault's interest in the work of Blanchot and Roussel, providing a``hiding place of a cryptic phenomenology'', see Rajan (1988). studies, The Order of Things and The Archaeology of Knowledge (Foucault, 19701972[1969; see Deleuze, 1988;Dreyfus and Rabinow, 1982) but I want to make a more general point here linking Roussel to Foucault's wider archaeological approach that runs throughout his work.…”
Section: The Spaces Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been defined as the varying perspectives of a story that can be constructed to make experience comprehensible [22] (p. 37), the treatment of data as stories [23] where narrative data are the result of a communication exchange [24] and an understanding of how human actions are related to the social context in which they occur including where and how [25]. In choosing narrative research to investigate The Order of Things, it is recognized both that Foucault tells a story about the differences among the three periods of scientific thinking he identifies and, at the same time, that this story does not follow an obvious plot and has a literary structure that has been described as "baroque" [26] (p. 449). Primarily, this meandering plot is what makes the analysis offered in the book so difficult to decipher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%