2017
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2017.1413503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Philippine presidency in Southeast Asian perspective: imperiled and imperious presidents but not perilous presidentialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding some features of a parliamentary system, most notably the presence of the prime minister, the South Korean president is often referred to as an “imperial president” because of his or her overwhelming political power and authority for policy implementation (Lim and Roh, 2020: 27). Thus, considering that presidentialism is prone to generating a personalized political arrangement (Linz, 1990; Thompson, 2018), examining the family information of South Korean presidents and comparing it to other presidential systems is an appropriate staring point to measure the country's degree of political dynastization.…”
Section: Is Political ‘Dynastization’ Deepening In South Korea?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding some features of a parliamentary system, most notably the presence of the prime minister, the South Korean president is often referred to as an “imperial president” because of his or her overwhelming political power and authority for policy implementation (Lim and Roh, 2020: 27). Thus, considering that presidentialism is prone to generating a personalized political arrangement (Linz, 1990; Thompson, 2018), examining the family information of South Korean presidents and comparing it to other presidential systems is an appropriate staring point to measure the country's degree of political dynastization.…”
Section: Is Political ‘Dynastization’ Deepening In South Korea?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the EDSA Republic does not have a good record on human rights, including the issues related to extrajudicial killings and press freedom. 71 During the EDSA period, human rights institutions were continuously undermined and marginalised. The difference in the period under review is that while the EDSA Republic was guilty of an institutional assault on human rights, through deliberate neglect or otherwise, Duterte's authoritarian populism is a bold and vocal attack on both the institutions and ideas of human rights.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Philippines can be characterised as a case of pure presidentialism where there is strict institutional separation between the president and the congress, and both are elected separately with fixed terms (Thompson, 2017). This institutional set up makes the government prone to gridlock due to the absence of a democratic principle that can resolve conflict between two electorally mandated bodies (Linz, 1990).…”
Section: Presidential Influence Over Legislation In the Philippinesmentioning
confidence: 99%