Twelve years have passed since I first presented-to the German Institute in Jerusalem-my ideas on the chronology of the Iron Age strata in the Levant and how it impacts on our understanding of the biblical narrative on the United Monarchy of ancient Israel. 1 I was naïve enough then to believe that the logic of my 'correction' was straightforward and clear. Twelve years and many articles and public debates later, however, the notion of Davidic conquests, Solomonic building projects, and a glamorous United Monarchy-all based on an uncritical reading of the biblical text and in contradiction of archaeological findsis still alive in certain quarters. This paper presents my updated views on this matter, and tackles several recent claims that archaeology has now proven the historicity of the biblical account of the great kingdom of David and Solomon.