2017
DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2017-22-1-5-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The philosophy of complexity management in terms of convergence of socio-humanitarian and natural-science knowledge. Papers of the “round table”

Abstract: Материалы «круглого стола» В.С. Степин. Когда начиналось в нашей стране это движение-философия техники, было не так много людей, которые в нем участвовали: Б.И. Иванов, В.В. Чешев, В.Г. Горохов, В.М. Розин. Позже направление расширилось и, как говорится, обросло кадрами. Поскольку долгое время техническое знание рассматривалось как знание сугубо прикладное, возникла такая проблема: а есть ли в нем теоретический уровень, и если есть, в чем он состоит, существуют ли развитые технические теории? Виталий Георгиеви… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is known from the philosophical and methodological literature, the historical periodization of science by types of scientific rationality was made by V. Styopin. Starting from the 1990s, he published several scientific works in which he argued that the development of modern science had taken place through four global revolutions: the first of them took place in the XVII century and marked the formation of classical natural science; the second, at the turn of the XVII and XVIII centuries, meant the formation of disciplinebased science; the thirdfrom the end of the XIX to the middle of the XX centurycontributed to the formation of non-classical natural science; in the course of the fourth revolutionsince the last third of the XX centurythere was the formation of post-nonclassical science (highlighted by V. Styopin) [1]. According to these global scientific revolutions, in his opinion, such historical types of scientific rationality were formed in the history of scienceclassical, non-classical and post-non-classical [ibid].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it is known from the philosophical and methodological literature, the historical periodization of science by types of scientific rationality was made by V. Styopin. Starting from the 1990s, he published several scientific works in which he argued that the development of modern science had taken place through four global revolutions: the first of them took place in the XVII century and marked the formation of classical natural science; the second, at the turn of the XVII and XVIII centuries, meant the formation of disciplinebased science; the thirdfrom the end of the XIX to the middle of the XX centurycontributed to the formation of non-classical natural science; in the course of the fourth revolutionsince the last third of the XX centurythere was the formation of post-nonclassical science (highlighted by V. Styopin) [1]. According to these global scientific revolutions, in his opinion, such historical types of scientific rationality were formed in the history of scienceclassical, non-classical and post-non-classical [ibid].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, V. Styopin's studies concerning the revolution in science itself, which led to changing the type of scientific rationality and at the turn of the XX and XXI centuries, contributed to the formation of post-non-classical rationality. The philosopher substantiated that "the foundations of science are, on the one hand, a component of the internal structure of science, but, on the other hand, of its infrastructure, which mediates the impact on the scientific cognition of socio-cultural factors and the integration of scientific knowledge in the culture of the corresponding historical era" [1]. The modern historical era is rightly called the information era, which corresponds to both the increasing role of computer science and information and communication technologies in the development of science itself, and the widespread use of these technologies in the social practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern vector of civilizational sustainable development of society requires the intensive implementation and dissemination of global technologies: nano-, bio-, information and communication technologies and convergent technologies, as well as the development of socio-humanitarian technologies. (Arshinov & Budanov, 2016;Chuprov, 2012;Roco & Bainbridge & Tonn etc. ;Babkina, 2017;Melnyk, 2017;Kapitsa, 2018;Ramazanova et al, 2019;Kovalchuk & Naraikin & Yatsishina, 2013;Lecturer, 2011;Melnyk, 2015;Kazantsev & Kiselev & Rubvalter & Rudensky, 2012;Levashova, 2011A, Gryshova, 2019.…”
Section: Humanity Has a Chance To Find A Way Out Of Global Crises But...mentioning
confidence: 99%