2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The map which accompanies the textual description and is already visible in the facsimile reproduction, is presented again in an enlarged view and shown side by side with a contemporary map where corresponding places are geolocated ( Figure 15 – Figure 16 ). Even if we are aware of the arbitrariness of juxtaposing representations reflecting such different theoretical conceptualizations of space and its representations, this practice presents itself as inevitable as it is also the case for all those digital projects in archaeology and other disciplines focusing on the ancient world where a comparison between ancient and modern geography is required ( Tambassi, 2018 , 37).…”
Section: Frontend Output: An Example Of the Digital Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The map which accompanies the textual description and is already visible in the facsimile reproduction, is presented again in an enlarged view and shown side by side with a contemporary map where corresponding places are geolocated ( Figure 15 – Figure 16 ). Even if we are aware of the arbitrariness of juxtaposing representations reflecting such different theoretical conceptualizations of space and its representations, this practice presents itself as inevitable as it is also the case for all those digital projects in archaeology and other disciplines focusing on the ancient world where a comparison between ancient and modern geography is required ( Tambassi, 2018 , 37).…”
Section: Frontend Output: An Example Of the Digital Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timothy Tambassi, in his Preface to the book "The Philosophy of GIS" [13], pointed out that the literature on GIS is heterogeneous and scattered, primarily because of the multiple branches of knowledge that use, manage, and create geographic information. This is also true for geosemantics, whose literature configures a conceptual 'forest' of issues, topics, technologies, methodologies, challenges, and solutions where it is easy to loose orientation.…”
Section: A Meta-analysis Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Western scientific thought, ontology is the philosophy of reality that addresses the question, “what kinds of things are there in the world?” There are a wide variety of ontological positions, from idealism (ultimate reality is human consciousness), to materialism (only matter is real), or agnosticism (the true nature of the world cannot be known) (Benton and Craib, 2001). Within a discipline or field of study, ontologies may be implicit and assumed, or much debated and researched (notably, in geography and computer science (Cablitz, 2001; Liu et al , 2017; Tambassi, 2017)).…”
Section: What Is Ontology? the Philosophical Underpinning Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%