2003
DOI: 10.1086/382738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Phonology of Yurok Glottalized Sonorants: Segmental Fission under Syllabification

Abstract: Yurok, an endangered Algic language of northwest California, has a series of glottalized sonorants which contrast with plain nonglottalized sonorants. Glottalized sonorants have interesting phonological properties which distinguish them from other segment types in Yurok, including a restriction to postvocalic environments and fission under syllabification. In this paper, I analyze sound patterns involving Yurok glottalized sonorants and discuss their implications for phonological theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Blevins (2003) uses a preceding apostrophe for preglottalization (e.g. ['l], extending the use of this diacritic from ejectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, Blevins (2003) uses a preceding apostrophe for preglottalization (e.g. ['l], extending the use of this diacritic from ejectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of languages where preglottalization varies between full glottal stop and laryngealization include Hupa (Athabaskan), where the glottalization associated with sonorants is often realized as creakiness rather than a full glottal stop, especially in the case of preglottalized sonorants (Gordon 1996: 167), and Yurok (Blevins 2003).…”
Section: Phoneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Lai, there is substantial variation in the location of glottalization, which can only occur in coda position, but it tends to be preglottalized (Plauché et al, 1998). Likewise, glottalized nasals in Deg Xinag codas are also preglottalized (Hargus, 2016), as are glottalized sonorants in Yurok (which are devoiced if they occur word finally) (Blevins, 2003). In Hupa, there is an unusual phonemic contrast between root‐final preglottalized and postglottalized nasals, which arose because the preglottalized nasals used to be in prevocalic position, but these words underwent an apocape process that eliminated the final short vowel (Gordon, 1996; Gordon & Ladefoged, 2001).…”
Section: Contrastive Creaky Phonation In Consonants and Vowelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also attested in Yurok, as shown byBlevins (2003).22 We only consider versions of moraic theory which allow segments to directly associate to the syllable likeHayes (1989), excluding the versions ofHyman (1985),Zec (1988) andItô (1989), where all segments are dominated by a mora. We also set aside theories which combine moras and skeletal positions, such asVago (1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%