2016
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Phylogenetic Intrarelationships of Spiny-Rayed Fishes (Acanthomorpha, Teleostei, Actinopterygii): Fossil Taxa Increase the Congruence of Morphology with Molecular Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the ability to "dissect" a subset of well supported clades around the node of interest that meet the monophyly criterion may become another critical limitation of the GGI approach. For example, this seems to be the case with the difficulty of resolving controversial branching patterns proposed by different studies at the base of the neoteleost and acanthopterygian fish radiations (Near et al 2012;Betancur-R. et al 2013;Grande et al 2013;Davesne et al 2016;Nelson et al 2016;Alfaro et al 2018). Fortunately, this is not the case for the apparent incongruence in otophysan relationships or characiform monophyly.…”
Section: Phylogenomic Incongruence and Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ability to "dissect" a subset of well supported clades around the node of interest that meet the monophyly criterion may become another critical limitation of the GGI approach. For example, this seems to be the case with the difficulty of resolving controversial branching patterns proposed by different studies at the base of the neoteleost and acanthopterygian fish radiations (Near et al 2012;Betancur-R. et al 2013;Grande et al 2013;Davesne et al 2016;Nelson et al 2016;Alfaro et al 2018). Fortunately, this is not the case for the apparent incongruence in otophysan relationships or characiform monophyly.…”
Section: Phylogenomic Incongruence and Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Davesne et al . , ): (1) there is no frontal ‘vault’; (2) the mesethmoid expands anteriorly and posteriorly to the lateral ethmoids, while in modern lampridiforms it only expands posteriorly; (3) the articulation between the anterior ceratohyal and the ventral hypohyal is not condylar; (4) the anteriormost dorsal‐fin pterygiophore inserts posterior to the first neural spine. Additional features, found in all Lampridiformes except for Veliferidae (Olney et al .…”
Section: Systematic Position Of †Bajaichthysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Davesne et al . ): (1) the neural spine of the first abdominal vertebra is closely associated with the neurocranium; (2) the second abdominal vertebra is shortened; (3) the orbitosphenoid is absent (although described present by Sorbini & Bottura ); (4) the palatine does not bear teeth.…”
Section: Systematic Position Of †Bajaichthysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its phylogenetic position (exemplified by A. ocellaris and the damselfish Stegastes partitus, whose genomes have been sequenced) is shown in Figure . It illustrates how it is nested in the late radiation of the Perciformes, cichlids being the closest classical fish model . Pomacentrids have developed fascinating innovations that can provide fertile ground for evo‐devo studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It illustrates how it is nested in the late radiation of the Perciformes, cichlids being the closest classical fish model. [34][35][36] Pomacentrids have developed fascinating innovations that can provide fertile ground for evodevo studies. For example, they independently evolved jaw protrusion ability, thus providing one case of this convergent feature, allowing the analyses of how different ontogenetic F I G U R E 1 Phylogeny of 16 representative fish species used in developmental biology or evolutionary sciences, including the clownfish c and the damselfish Stegastes partitus (both colored in red) trajectories reach similar solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%