The Phylogenetic Relationships of the Family Sciaenidae Based on Genome-Wide Data Analysis

Abstract

Uncertainty and controversy exist in the phylogenetic status of the Sciaenidae family because of the limited genetic data availability. In this study, a data set of 69,098 bp, covering 309 shared orthologous genes, was extracted from 18 genomes and 5 transcriptomes of 12 species belonging to the Sciaenidae family and used for phylogenetic analysis. The maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian approach (BA) methods were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees. The resolved ML and BA trees showed similar topology, thus revealing two major evolutionary lineages within the Sciaenidae family, namely, Western Atlantic (WA) and Eastern Atlantic–Indo–West Pacific (EIP). The WA group included four species belonging to four genera: Cynoscion nebulosus, Equetus punctatus, Sciaenops ocellatus, and Micropogonias undulatus. Meanwhile, the EIP group formed one monophyletic clade, harboring eight species (Argyrosomus regius, A. japonicus, Pennahia anea, Nibea albiflora, Miichthys miiuy, Collichthys lucidus, Larimichthys polyactis, and L. crocea) from six genera. Our results indicated that the Western Atlantic (WA) group was more ancient in the studied species, while the Eastern Atlantic–Indo–West Pacific (EIP) group was a younger group. Within the studied species, the genera Collichthys and Larmichthys were the youngest lineages, and we do not suggest that Collichthys and Larmichthys should be considered as one genus. However, the origin of the Sciaenidae family and problems concerning the basal genus were not resolved because of the lack of genomes. Therefore, further sampling and sequencing efforts are needed.

Complete mitogenome and intra-family comparative mitogenomics showed distinct position of Pama Croaker Otolithoides pama

“…This result was consistent with previous findings 41 , 50 . Argyrosomus genus formed a clade by clustering with sister taxon Sciaenops ocellatus and Micropogonias furnieri with highest branch support which was seen in previous phylogenetic study 52 , 53 . They all seemed to be close relatives of Pseudotolithus genus, Aplodinotus grunniens , and Menticirrhus littoralis 50 , 54 .…”