1998
DOI: 10.1038/29667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard process in most cases incorporates a reliable dating of artefacts along with a decision process based on similarities (as perceived by an observer) and sometimes available written information that 'connects' two given objects or inventions. The best case scenario is provided by the phylogenetic analysis of written texts [21,22].…”
Section: Technological Evolutionary Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard process in most cases incorporates a reliable dating of artefacts along with a decision process based on similarities (as perceived by an observer) and sometimes available written information that 'connects' two given objects or inventions. The best case scenario is provided by the phylogenetic analysis of written texts [21,22].…”
Section: Technological Evolutionary Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the impact combines the structural similarities in (2.1) by taking a weighted sum with l [ f0,1g (figure 2d). Hereafter, we set e ¼ 10 29 and l ¼ 1/2 [21]. This measure of (directed) link strength not only takes into account asymmetric random walk transitions but also represents a good trade-off between accuracy and complexity for smallworld networks [30] having short (average) path lengths (like the PL network, see the electronic supplementary material, S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howe et al (2001) describe how different manuscript versions of the same text can be used to reconstruct the evolution of that text. This was demonstrated by Barbrook et al (1998), who used cladistic methods to reconstruct the historical relationships between 58 different manuscripts of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, improving on previous nonphylogenetic reconstructions. Bentley et al (2004), meanwhile, found that the frequencies of first names and patent applications in twentieth-century United States both conform to a simple model of random copying originally developed in evolutionary biology (Crow & Kimura 1970).…”
Section: Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descent-withmodification has also been a precept informing studies of manuscript traditions in the genealogical or stemmatological approach since the nineteenth century (Robins 2007), with recent studies applying formal phylogenetic methods (e.g. Barbrook et al 1998) and modelling the survivorship of variants in terms of an underlying birth-death process (Weitzman 1987;Cisne 2005).…”
Section: Introduction: Cultural Transmission and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%