The Physical Activity Assessment of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Accelerometer-Based Cut Points: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Incorporating physical activity into lifestyle routines is recommended for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Accelerometers offer a promising method for objectively measuring physical activity and for assessing interventions. However, the existing literature for accelerometer-measured physical activity among middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes is lacking. Objective This study aims to identify research studies in which accelerometer-based cut points were used to classify the physical activity intensity of middle-aged to older adults with type 2 diabetes as sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous, and to determine if validated accelerometer cut points specifically for this population exist. Methods We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Between June 23 and July 12, 2020, two reviewers independently screened records from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Engineering Village) and the ActiGraph Corp web site for eligible studies that included patients with type 2 diabetes with a sample mean age ≥50 years, used research-grade accelerometers, applied cut points to categorize objectively measured physical activity, and were available in English. We excluded studies reporting exclusively steps or step counts measured by accelerometers or pedometers and conference abstracts or other sources that did not have a full text available. Data extraction was completed using Microsoft Excel. Data for the following variables were tabulated based on frequency distributions: study design, accelerometer type, device placement, epoch length, total wear time, and cut points used. Study aims and participant demographic data were summarized. Results A total of 748 records were screened at the abstract level, and 88 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 46 articles were retained and analyzed. Participants’ mean ages ranged from 50 to 79.9 years. The ActiGraph accelerometer and the Freedson et al and Troiano et al counts-per-minute cut points were the most frequently used across the literature. Freedson et al and Troiano et al counts-per-minute cut points for light, moderate, and vigorous activity correspond to <1952, 1952-5724, and ≥5725, and 100-2019, 2020-5998, and ≥5999, respectively. The Lopes et al cut points were developed by calibrating the ActiGraph in middle-aged and older adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. These counts-per-minute thresholds are ≥200 (light), ≥1240 (moderate), and ≥2400 (vigorous), and were applied in 1 interventional study. Conclusions An assortment of accelerometer cut points have been used by researchers to categorize physical activity intensity for middle-aged and older adults with diabetes. Only one set of cut points was validated and calibrated in our population of interest. Additional research is warranted to address the need for diabetes-specific cut points to inform public health recommendations. This includes confirmation that the Lopes et al cut points reflect clinically meaningful changes in physical activity for adults with diabetes who have comorbidities other than overweight/obesity and the development of relative intensity cut points that may be more suitable for those with suboptimal physical functioning.

Effectiveness of an Immersive Telemedicine Platform for Delivering Diabetes Medical Group Visits for African American, Black and Hispanic, or Latina Women With Uncontrolled Diabetes: The Women in Control 2.0 Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

“…We experienced challenges with accelerometry wear due to participants’ discomfort with the devices. A literature review revealed that accelerometry-measured activity for middle-aged women with chronic disease has limitations [ 44 ], such that physical activity can be underestimated or inconsistent across the life span [ 37 , 45 , 46 ]. More research is needed to establish activity assessment guidelines for older adults.…”

Is Web-Based Program Effective on Self-Care Behaviors and Glycated Hemoglobin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…However, the use of modern technology, such as accelerometers, may help overcome this barrier in the future. [ 28 ] Low levels of self-efficacy, improper goal setting, lack or inadequacy of facilities, inadequacy of family/social support, and insufficient attention to the details of cultural characteristics are other reasons. Additionally, the living environment, such as buildings, safe places to walk, and green spaces, also plays a crucial role in determining the ability and enthusiasm to be regularly active.…”

Physical Activity Perceptions and Participation of People With Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the Dominican Republic

“…Troiano et al [ 16 ] counts/minute cut points were used to differentiate between light intensity (100-2,019), moderate intensity (2,020-5,998), and vigorous intensity (≥5,999). The Troiano cut points were used because they provide a relatively high threshold of moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA which makes these data fairly conservative [ 17 ]. Data were recorded at 30 Hz, and 60-second epochs were used.…”