1997
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x9709100404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physical Costs and Psychosocial Benefits of Travel Aids for Persons who are Visually Impaired Or Blind

Abstract: This study investigated the musculoskeletal consequences of using travel aids, particularly white canes and dog guides, as perceived by 21 individuals, aged 27 to 68 years, who are visually impaired or blind. These individuals experienced a variety of negative physical effects that they either denied, ignored, or minimized because of the fundamental biophysical, psychological, and social benefits derived from being independently mobile and because of the need to attend to environmental cues to ensure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercial device interfaces may be difficult or impossible for persons with disabilities to use, requiring expensive custom programming. 52 Although research is needed to help determine what types and levels of ability are needed to learn and operate many types of assistive technology, and to evaluate how devices should be changed to accommodate users with cognitive as well as physical disabilities, high-tech ATC may present its own set of challenges. Previous authors 53 have speculated about client characteristics that may predict success with electronic devices among persons with brain injury, but these have not yet been tested systematically.…”
Section: Can People With Cognitive Disabilities Manage Their Own Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial device interfaces may be difficult or impossible for persons with disabilities to use, requiring expensive custom programming. 52 Although research is needed to help determine what types and levels of ability are needed to learn and operate many types of assistive technology, and to evaluate how devices should be changed to accommodate users with cognitive as well as physical disabilities, high-tech ATC may present its own set of challenges. Previous authors 53 have speculated about client characteristics that may predict success with electronic devices among persons with brain injury, but these have not yet been tested systematically.…”
Section: Can People With Cognitive Disabilities Manage Their Own Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A guide dog is a domestic dog ( Canis familiaris ) that is specially trained to provide mobility support to a blind or visually impaired owner. As a mobility aid guide dogs can improve an individual’s physical activity level, distance travelled, the pace of walking speed, and familiarity of routes considered [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Beyond their trained role in mobility support, guide dogs can also provide: feelings of increased independence, confidence and safety[ 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 ]; affection and companionship[ 2 , 3 ]; facilitation of social interaction[ 2 , 5 , 6 , 8 ]; and positive changes in social identity[ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The day-to-day experience of using a guide dog has received some attention in the professional and non-professional literature, but much of the information available is anecdotal or based on individual accounts. Psychosocial benefi ts of using a guide dog have been reported (Gitlin, Mount, Lucas, Weirich, & Gramberg, 1997;Lambert, 1990;Muldoon, 2000;Refson, Jackson, Dusoir, & Archer, 1999;Sanders, 2000;Steffans & Bergler, 1998;Zee, 1983) and reasons why some people with vision impairments chose not to use a dog (Refson et al, 1999;Refson, Jackson, Plant, et al, 2000). In addition to their working role, like pets, guide dogs and other trained service dogs, a category which include hearing dogs for the deaf, mobility assistance dogs, and seizure-alert dogs, benefi t people with disabilities by providing friendship and companionship (Hart, Zasloff, & Benfatto, 1995), acting as social facilitators (Eddy, Hart, & Boltz, 1988;Hart, Hart, & Bergin, 1987), and enhancing self-perceived health (Lane, M c Nicholas, & Collis, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%