2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2117.2002.00189.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physical scale modelling of braided alluvial architecture and estimation of subsurface permeability

Abstract: The quantitative modelling of fluvial reservoirs, especially in the stages of enhanced oil recovery, requires detailed three-dimensional data at both the scale of the channel belt and within-channel. Although studies from core, analogue outcrop and modern environments may partially meet these needs, they often cannot provide detail on the smaller-scale (i.e. channel-scale) heterogeneity, frequently suffer from limited three-dimensional exposure and cannot be used to examine the influence of different variables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) where D 10 is the grain size, with D in millimetres (Moreton et al, 2002). This is utilized in this case as a surrogate for relative permeability of the substrate, to give an indication of the potential differences in available water between plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) where D 10 is the grain size, with D in millimetres (Moreton et al, 2002). This is utilized in this case as a surrogate for relative permeability of the substrate, to give an indication of the potential differences in available water between plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*Surface percentage of gravel and sand is based on an 8 mm diameter threshold to distinguish between the two sediment types (gravel > 8 mm, sand < 8 mm), as smaller grain sizes cannot be determined accurately from photographs. †Index of permeability based on the D 10 of the grain-size distribution (see Moreton et al, 2002). ‡Elevation is relative to the High Mixed plot, which was at the level of the vegetated surface of the nearest river island.…”
Section: Seedling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal shape of bars on the edge define a developed sorting pattern, as also described in Nelson et al (2010). The braided channel in the flume also showed complex and diverse grain sorting patterns of the kind seen in full-scale braided rivers, including lateral sorting at confluences, coarse deposits on bar heads at bifurcations, fine-grained lateral bars on the downstream margins of braid bars, and lateral fining in bends and on bars (see also Moreton et al, 2002;Gardner and Ashmore, 2011).…”
Section: Natural and Modeled Surface Grain Sortingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analyses have typically focused on facies patterns and sedimentary structure, but several have mentioned that there is little vertical trend in grain sizes in braided river gravels (e.g., Bluck, 1979;Sambrook Smith, 2000;Heinz et al, 2003;Lunt and Bridge, 2004;Guerit et al, 2014;Marren, 2005;StorzPeretz and Laronne, 2013b). Similarly, physical models of aggraded braided gravel alluvium show patches and threads of distinct facies but no clear trend in grain size (e.g., Moreton et al, 2002). However, these generalities, while useful indications, are based on limited sampling and quantification of trends in particle size sorting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated methods like multi-point geostatistical techniques excel indeed at respecting local data and allow more realistic representations of spatial patterns, but are still dependent on the input of training images that already purport the spatial heterogeneity (Hu and Chugunova, 2008). Given the shortcomings of spatial modelling based on using "pure" geostatistics (Koltermann and Gorelick, 1996), alternative approaches have been developed in recent years: Grunwald et al (2000) implemented the Virtual Reality Modelling Language in combination with soil data, topographical attributes, and kriging to create 3-D representations of soil landscapes; Zappa et al (2006) conditioned 3-D geostatistical simulations using "model blocks" derived from soil profiles that represent facies associations to model a glaciofluvial aquifer; Moreton et al (2002) used a physical model of the subsurface depositional stratigraphy of a braided river system to feed object-based digital spatial reservoir models, while Teles et al (2001) used a multi-agent concept in combination with simple construction rules based on literature and observations to reproduce the structure of an alluvial plain. Sech et al (2009) developed a surface-based spatial modelling approach that enables explicit representation of heterogeneity across a hierarchy of length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%