2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physician-nurse collaboration in feeding critically ill patients: A multicenter survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta‐analysis done in 2017 by Binbin Mei et al [16] on 1845 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery showed similar results of reduced time to pass first flatus ( p 0.006), first bowel movement ( p < 0.0001), and total length of hospital stay ( p 0.001) as observed in this study, which further strengthen our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A meta‐analysis done in 2017 by Binbin Mei et al [16] on 1845 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery showed similar results of reduced time to pass first flatus ( p 0.006), first bowel movement ( p < 0.0001), and total length of hospital stay ( p 0.001) as observed in this study, which further strengthen our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many literature data have highlighted as in real-life settings the nutritional component of care is burdened by several criticalities involving both the medical and nursing ICU teams (e.g., prescribing undue fasting periods, late involvement of dieticians, insufficient protein and energy, inadequate nurse staffing, poor interprofessional communication), so that nutritional goals are often unmet. [22][23][24][25] A delayed onset of EN, the prescription of inadequate nutritional support (lower or higher than expected), the failure to titrate the administration rate after the initial prescription and the administration of less-than planned EN are frequently encountered situations. [26][27][28][29] Nevertheless, although missing the energy target is a well-known risk factor for negative clinical outcomes in ICU patient receiving EN, 30 at present the debate about the optimal nutritional target in critically ill patients is far from being solved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that the reason could be related to the fact that, despite the intention to provide a personalised calorie and protein intake, in daily clinical practice a tendency to prescribe a standard amount of nutritional support regardless of the expected ER may have occurred. Many literature data have highlighted as in real‐life settings the nutritional component of care is burdened by several criticalities involving both the medical and nursing ICU teams (e.g., prescribing undue fasting periods, late involvement of dieticians, insufficient protein and energy, inadequate nurse staffing, poor interprofessional communication), so that nutritional goals are often unmet 22–25 . A delayed onset of EN, the prescription of inadequate nutritional support (lower or higher than expected), the failure to titrate the administration rate after the initial prescription and the administration of less‐than planned EN are frequently encountered situations 26–29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of an organization is often determined by the role of leaders who are willing to bring organizational members towards achieving vision, mission, and goals. The leader can provide social effects with a personal approach [47,48], authentic style [49,50], and building of two-way communication [14,[51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Cp Significantly Increases Cpat Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%