The physiology and brain mechanisms of feeding

Rowland, Neil E.; Morien, Annie; Li, Bai-Han

doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(96)00227-4

Cited by 52 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 136 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results further indicated that the effect of hyperphagia was dose dependent (40-80nmol and not at 20nmol). Although these studies strongly suggest a role of NA on macronutrient selection other studies did not support these findings (as reviewed by Rowland et al, 1996;Thibault and Booth, 1999 corn oil.for the mice). In one of the experiments, the mice were restricted to a 6-h feeding period between 09h00-15h00 (Currie & Wilson, 1992).…”

Section: 122-noradrenahne Food Intake and Macronutrient Selectionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Effect of sibutramine on macronutrient selection in male and female rats

Leblanc

Thibault

2003

Physiology & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: 122-noradrenahne Food Intake and Macronutrient Selectionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Effect of sibutramine on macronutrient selection in male and female rats

Leblanc

Thibault

2003

Physiology & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…During the ''lunch'' break in the middle of the night shift external factors (inadequate canteen facilities, poor facilities for sitting down and enjoying a meal) or internal factors (individual not feeling hungry or individual not finding the available foods palatable) might affect food intake. An unadjusted body clock might contribute to the internal factors, with rhythms of the gastrointestinal tract activity and hypothalamic feeding centers timed inappropriately for night eating (Auwerda et al, 2001;Bortolotti et al, 2000;Keller et al, 2001;Rowland et al, 1996;Stanley et al, 1989;Strubbe and van Dijk, 2002;Vener et al, 1989;Waterhouse et al, 1999). Whatever the reason(s), night workers commonly admit to altered eating habits (Lennernas et al, 1995;Nikolova et al, 1990;Tepas, 1990) in terms of both the distribution and types of meals consumed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of, and Some Reasons for, Differences in Eating Habits Between Night and Day Workers

Waterhouse

Buckley

Edwards

et al. 2003

Chronobiology International

155

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A questionnaire was designed to assess the following: why working people chose to eat or not to eat at a particular time of day; the factors that influenced the type of food eaten; and subjective responses to the meal (hunger before, enjoyment during, satiety afterward). Self-assessments were done every 3 h during a typical week containing work and rest days, by one group of 50 day workers and another group of 43 night workers. During the night work hours compared to rest days, night workers evidenced a significantly altered food intake, with a greater frequency of cold rather than hot food (p < 0.001). The type and frequency of meals were influenced significantly more (p < 0.05) by habit and time availability and less by appetite. This pattern continued into the hours immediately after the night shift had ended. In day workers food intake during work hours, compared to rest days, was also influenced significantly more often (p < 0.05) by time availability than hunger, but less so than with night workers. Moreover, day workers were less dependent than night workers upon snacks (p = 0.01), and any significant differences from rest days did not continue beyond work hours. Not only did night workers change their eating habits during work days more than did day workers but also they looked forward to their meals significantly less (p < 0.001) and felt more bloated after consuming them (p < 0.05), such effects being present to some extent during their rest days also. These findings have clear implications for measures designed to ease eating problems that are commonly problematic in night workers.

show abstract

“…This has allowed the investigation of both primary sensory (Berthoud, 2002;Drewnowski, 1997;French and Cecil, 2001;Rolls, 1997;Rolls and Rolls, 1997;Rowland et al, 1996;Schwartz et al, 2000) and secondary perceptual interactions (Calvert, 2001;Delwiche, 2003;Hort and Hollowood, 2004), which are ultimately important in the control of feeding (Rolls, Abbreviations: AC, anterior cingulated; APcI-MS, atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry; BOLD, blood oxygenation level dependent; EPI, echo-planar imaging; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; FWHM, full width at half maximum; HRF, Haemodynamic response function; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PET, positron emission tomography; TE, echo time; TTP, time to peak * Corresponding author. 1997; Schwartz et al, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%