1990
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pill, parity, and rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: We report on a case-control study investigating the relationship of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use and parity to the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Women with RA were compared with 2 separate control groups, women with osteoarthritis (OA) and women randomly selected from a population-based electoral register. Nulliparity was found to be a risk factor for the development of RA, with age-adjusted odds ratios of 1.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.03) versus the OA control group and 1.83 (95% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
86
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 9 cases and 5 controls reported tetanus immunization in the 6 weeks prior to onset, and so the study lacked the power to assess tetanus immunization as a risk factor. The study has also failed to show an association between RA and nulliparity, as has been reported previously (29)(30)(31) (Table 6). None of the previous studies used cases derived from primary care, and it may be that nulliparity is a risk factor for a poor prognosis rather than for disease susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Only 9 cases and 5 controls reported tetanus immunization in the 6 weeks prior to onset, and so the study lacked the power to assess tetanus immunization as a risk factor. The study has also failed to show an association between RA and nulliparity, as has been reported previously (29)(30)(31) (Table 6). None of the previous studies used cases derived from primary care, and it may be that nulliparity is a risk factor for a poor prognosis rather than for disease susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The advantage of selecting the former is the potential for a higher response rate and a reduction in the likelihood of major lifestyle differences that could confound the results obtained. The similarity in cases and controls might have masked a difference in nulliparity, which has been found in other studies (5,6). This similarity, in contrast, would not detract from the positive results of the study of the timing of pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Subsequent investigation both by ourselves (6) and by others (12) suggested that this was not generally true, and that nulliparity might be a risk factor. The results from the current study are therefore compatible with the hypothesis that pregnancy suppresses the onset and activity of rheumatoid arthritis, but that in a group of susceptible women, pregnancy might paradoxically induce disease onset, the presentation of which is delayed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, OC use, as recorded at each assessment during followup, did not have a significant effect overall, i.e., taking OCs either before or around the time of symptom onset appears to be of the greatest overall benefit. The composition of OCs has, however, become increasingly less potent since they were first made available in the 1960s (21,22). This may partially explain why, in this longitudinal study that did not start enrolling patients until 30 years after the introduction of OCs, OC use before symptom onset appeared to have a greater impact on disease outcome than use during followup, despite a longer time since exposure to the OC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%