2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pitfalls and potential of debt-for-nature swaps: A US-Indonesian case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, such a bilateral deal was signed between the United States and Indonesia, swapping nearly US$ 30 million of Indonesian government debt owed to the United States over the next eight years against Indonesia's commitment to spend this sum on NGO projects bene…ting Sumatra's tropical forests (see Cassimon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, such a bilateral deal was signed between the United States and Indonesia, swapping nearly US$ 30 million of Indonesian government debt owed to the United States over the next eight years against Indonesia's commitment to spend this sum on NGO projects bene…ting Sumatra's tropical forests (see Cassimon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several experiences can help shedding some light on the relevance of the mechanism. For instance, Cassimon et al (2011) identify several shortcomings among which additionality. Moreover, Barbier (2011) draws attention on the need to find new sources of funding to make REDD like mechanisms more effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our position on this is outlined in Cassimon et al (2011a), and runs as follows. As the HIPC Initiative has ensured that most bilateral and multilateral debt owed by many low-income countries will be cancelled in due course, it appears that the greatest potential for utilising debt swaps for mitigation (such as debt-for-nature or debt-for-efficiency swaps) will mainly be within lower middle-income countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assess the impact of the debt swap on sustainable development and the availability of project finance by using a simple five-part framework (see Cassimon et al, 2011a): first, whether it delivers additional resources to the debtor country and/or government budget; second, whether it delivers more resources for climate change mitigation; third, whether it has a sizeable effect on overall debt burdens (thereby creating 'indirect' benefits); and, fourth and fifth, whether it adheres to the principles of alignment with both government policy and systems (two key elements within the new aid paradigm). The first two parts of this framework assess the contribution of the swap to project funding.…”
Section: A U T H O R C O P Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation