2008
DOI: 10.1075/la.120.16pan
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The place of PLACE in Persian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the various polysemies needed for such an analysis would be likely to be historical and external to the system of UG itself. For an interesting alternative involving a null nominal element PLACE, see Terzi (2004), Pantcheva (2006b) and references there.…”
Section: Refining Axpartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the various polysemies needed for such an analysis would be likely to be historical and external to the system of UG itself. For an interesting alternative involving a null nominal element PLACE, see Terzi (2004), Pantcheva (2006b) and references there.…”
Section: Refining Axpartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a long list of papers (including Terzi 2005Terzi , 2008Terzi , 2010Botwinik-Rotem 2008;Botwinik-Rotem and Terzi 2008;Pantcheva 2008;Cinque 2010a;Noonan 2010 andTerzi 2014) arguing that the PP-hierarchy is projected from a silent noun with a place semantics (PLACE), and the Ground is merged as the possessor of PLACE. 2 This leads us to (7) as the full structure of PPs, with the Ground being merged as the complement of the silent PLACE noun.…”
Section: Background Assumptions About Pp Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will adopt the complement analysis here, noting that nothing crucial in this paper hinges on this choice. See also Botwinik-Rotem (2008), Botwinik-Rotem and Terzi (2008), Pantcheva (2008), Noonan (2010) and Nchare and Terzi (2014) for analyses in which the possessor of PLACE is a complement.…”
Section: The Structure Of Ordinary Possessive Noun Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neighbourhood region is often expressed by a special functional word with a meaning like 'top', 'bottom', 'front', 'back', which is called relator noun (Blake 2001) or Axial Part (Svenonius 2006); hence some authors assume an AxPart projection in the prepositional structure (e.g. Kracht 2008, Pantcheva 2008. In the example above, the neighbourhood region is represented by ue and shita.…”
Section: Polish Prepositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%