2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2006.tb00431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The planforms of low‐angle impact craters in the northern hemisphere of Mars

Abstract: Abstract-We have surveyed Martian impact craters greater than 5 km in diameter using Viking and thermal emission imaging system (THEMIS) imagery to evaluate how the planform of the rim and ejecta changes with decreasing impact angle. We infer the impact angles at which the changes occur by assuming a sin 2 Θ dependence for the cumulative fraction of craters forming below angle Θ. At impact angles less than ~40° from horizontal, the ejecta become offset downrange relative to the crater rim. As the impact angle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory experiments with impacts into noncohesive sand produced elliptical craters at impact angles of 5° of the horizontal (Gault and Wedekind 1978). More recent experiments with impact into aluminum targets produced elliptical craters at a steeper impact angle of 12° from the horizontal, which is more in keeping with planetary remote sensing studies and also suggests that there is a target strength effect (Bottke et al 2000;Herrick and Hessen 2006). The planetary data indicate that ~4% of the crater populations have an aspect ratio of 1.2 or greater.…”
Section: Size and Shapesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Laboratory experiments with impacts into noncohesive sand produced elliptical craters at impact angles of 5° of the horizontal (Gault and Wedekind 1978). More recent experiments with impact into aluminum targets produced elliptical craters at a steeper impact angle of 12° from the horizontal, which is more in keeping with planetary remote sensing studies and also suggests that there is a target strength effect (Bottke et al 2000;Herrick and Hessen 2006). The planetary data indicate that ~4% of the crater populations have an aspect ratio of 1.2 or greater.…”
Section: Size and Shapesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Most secondaries that lie within He1 and He2 appear to be filled with ejecta, indicating ballistic ejecta emplacement was followed by surface flow, in agreement with Herrick and Hessen (2006). The rough terrain within He1 northeast of Hale makes it difficult to determine whether this depositional sequence holds in this area.…”
Section: Irregular Crater Clustersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The rim and terrace structures are clearly defined in the northern part of the crater. Hale was likely formed by an oblique impact from the southeast, due to its elongated northwest-southeast shape, its asymmetric ejecta blanket (Herrick and Hessen, 2006), its asymmetric central peak complex (peak size and elevation increases from southeast to northwest), and the distribution of secondary craters and streaks. The topographic slope of Argyre basin also influenced Hale's morphology.…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the ejecta blanket was often regarded as the only indicator to decipher azimuth and angle for an oblique impact (e.g. Herrick and Hessen, 2006;Chapter 4). The crater outline is in fact insensitive to the impact trajectory and remains circular with the exception for highly oblique impact (<10 °).…”
Section: Effects Of Oblique Impact Incidences On Cavity Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%