The plant in between: Entanglement and analogism in an Italian community of anthroposofists

Abstract

The article analyses the special relationship with the world of plants developed by anthroposophy from the framework of a new perspective called the “plant turn” (Myers 2015). Anthroposophy (AS) is analysed as a peculiar form of Analogism (Descola 2005), historically derived from the philosophy of Rudolf Steiner and subsequently evolved into contemporary AS practices that the author encountered during her fieldwork in a community of North-Eastern Italy. Both Steiner’s texts and the analysis of contemporary practices of AS reveal a relationship with the world of plants that the author reads in light of Ingold’s categories of “interweaving” of the world, the interpenetration of elements, and their ceaseless becoming (Ingold 2011). The result is a representation of the vegetal world involving the whole cosmos, humans and non-humans, terrestrial and celestial, in a cosmic expansion of the relations between beings typical of Analogisms. The practices referring to the vegetal world enacted by anthroposophists are intense, engaging, dialogue-based and provocative in their ability to uproot many elements of naturalism and deal with a contemporary world characterised by ecological crisis.

Les esprits scientifiques

“…Comment les praticiens des agricultures alternatives maintiennent-ils la tension, ou au contraire, l'étanchéité, entre registres spirituels et registres scientifiques ? Ces agricultures « étendent-elles le domaine de la lutte » scientifique au-delà des ontologies 6 Les ontologies en jeu dans les agricultures alternatives et leurs débordements sur l'analogisme et l'animisme ont déjà été analysées de façon relativement poussée par Nadia Breda (Breda, 2016) ou Christelle Pineau (Pineau, 2017). Une intervention de Jean Foyer lors de notre colloque de Lausanne était spécifiquement consacrée à défendre l'hypothèss « d'ontologies à géométrie variable » dans la biodynamie, hypothèse selon laquelle, en fonction des praticiens, de leurs niveaux d'initiation, de leurs parcours de vies et des contextes spatio-temporels, la biodynamie mobiliserait des registres aussi bien naturalistes qu'analogiques ou animistes.…”