1972
DOI: 10.1080/00385417.1972.10770323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Plowing up of the Virgin Lands and the Bobac Marmot Resources of Central Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that declines in burrow densities were steeper in persistent cropland compared to persistent grassland, and in plots that were cropped prior to the Virgin Lands Campaign, compared to plots converted later. The repeated disturbance of burrows through ploughing, likely led to increased colony stress and higher energy costs for re-establishing disturbed burrows [23,50,51], ultimately reducing colony fitness and size [23]. Because the declines were steepest in older fields, repeated disturbances associated with cropping may substantially decrease population size over time, despite the effects of single disturbances possibly being minor [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We showed that declines in burrow densities were steeper in persistent cropland compared to persistent grassland, and in plots that were cropped prior to the Virgin Lands Campaign, compared to plots converted later. The repeated disturbance of burrows through ploughing, likely led to increased colony stress and higher energy costs for re-establishing disturbed burrows [23,50,51], ultimately reducing colony fitness and size [23]. Because the declines were steepest in older fields, repeated disturbances associated with cropping may substantially decrease population size over time, despite the effects of single disturbances possibly being minor [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poisoning of burrowing mammals has been a common practice historically in parts of Canada, USA, and Mexico, but was not widely practiced in Kazakhstan [23,28]. Bobak marmot populations have been historically affected by overhunting and trapping, especially in Russia, but since the 1950s, hunting became regulated and the marmot population rebounded [26,50]. Furthermore, fur trapping and hunting are highest in proximity of human settlements, so their effects would be partially accounted for in our analyses via the predictor distance to farm [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breakdown of the Soviet Union resulted in the abandonment of a large area of cropland in some post-Soviet and ex-Soviet countries in the Eurasian steppe [14,16,24,85,86]. However, as one of the primary food providers for the former Soviet Union [87,88], it was unclear whether Kazakhstan had also experienced a similar change. According to the incomplete statistics from FAO, there has been a significant decreasing trend in arable land in Kazakhstan since 1995 ( Figure 2); however, our results showed rainfed and irrigated cropland at the national level had a significant increasing trend with a significant increasing stage before 1999-2000 and a relatively stable stage during 2000-2015 ( Figure 2), and the Mann-Kendall test and regime shift analysis at 14 regions also confirmed this result (Table 2, Figure 3).…”
Section: Cropland Area Change In the Post-soviet Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important traditional industry in Kazakhstan, agriculture had formed a relatively stable structure during the Soviet Union Era [89], which was affected very little by political surge. Due to its huge virgin land resources, especially the large area of the steppe [87,88,90], traditionally agricultural development is far easier than the development of other industries such as oil and gas [14,91]. Hence, a significant increase of cropland area in an earlier stage of newly sovereign Kazakhstan is a necessary consequence, with the coming of gradual foreign investment for resource exploitation, the agriculture in Kazakhstan lost its primary importance and cropland development showed a relatively stable trend [22,92,93].…”
Section: Cropland Area Change In the Post-soviet Eramentioning
confidence: 99%