Face and Gesture 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fg.2011.5771446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The POETICON enacted scenario corpus — A tool for human and computational experiments on action understanding

Abstract: A good data corpus lies at the heart of progress in both perceptual/cognitive science and in computer vision. While there are a few datasets that deal with simple actions, creating a realistic corpus for complex, long action sequences that contains also human-human interactions has so far not been attempted to our knowledge. Here, we introduce such a corpus for (inter)action understanding that contains six everyday scenarios taking place in a kitchen / living-room setting. Each scenario was acted out several t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Situated language and the symbol grounding problem (e.g., ELIZA, 108 the Loebner Prize, 109 and the POETICON project 110 ). 5.…”
Section: Autonomy-collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Situated language and the symbol grounding problem (e.g., ELIZA, 108 the Loebner Prize, 109 and the POETICON project 110 ). 5.…”
Section: Autonomy-collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stream of work around an approach dealing with the evolution of language and semiotics, is outlined in [87]. From a more applied and practical point of view though, one would like to be able to have grounded ontologies [88] [89] or even robotusable lexica augmented with computational models providing such grounding: and this is the ultimate goal of the EU projects POETICON [90] [91], and the follow-up project POETICON II.…”
Section: Situated Language and Symbol Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activities include 'having a conversation', 'phone calls', 'laying down', 'drinking' and 'eating', but may also include sub-actions within a higher level task, such as 'setting a table' or 'cooking a meal'. The executions may be allowed to occur naturally as in the 50 Salads, MPII Cooking, and MPII Composite datasets; or the observations may be more scripted, such as in the POETICON and the robotic class of the TUM Kitchen set [73,16,12]. By understanding the actions and interactions within a daily activity dataset the field is moving towards learning higher level semantics of human behavior via natural representations.…”
Section: Daily Livingmentioning
confidence: 99%