2013
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The policies of ethics committees in the management of biobanks used for research: an Italian survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last 10 years, around 60 biobank-related surveys have been conducted and published all over the world, with less than 20 being related to European biobanks. In Italy, few studies have been conducted in the last 10 years [ 16 , 36 , 37 ], with none being published in the last 3 years. Of the three studies conducted in Italy, just one [ 16 ], published in 2017, investigated the willingness to donate and the attitude towards biobanking among university students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 10 years, around 60 biobank-related surveys have been conducted and published all over the world, with less than 20 being related to European biobanks. In Italy, few studies have been conducted in the last 10 years [ 16 , 36 , 37 ], with none being published in the last 3 years. Of the three studies conducted in Italy, just one [ 16 ], published in 2017, investigated the willingness to donate and the attitude towards biobanking among university students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-eight ethics committees (ECs) took part in that study. Except for the questions specifically related to ECs’ activities, that were omitted, the questions used in this survey were the same questions used in the previous study [ 8 ]. Only people expressing their willingness to take part in a hypothetical biobank completed the questionnaire on the ethical aspects of the biobank management, which was organised in the following areas: informed consent (IC) and information for the subject; protection of confidentiality; ownership of samples and data and intellectual propriety rights (IPRs); communication of research results; subjects’ remuneration and benefit sharing; access/transfer of biological materials and related data; and length of storage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of consent offer the most degree of autonomy and a high level of control compared with broad consent. In general, other studies have shown a lack of consensus on the preferred type of consent [48,51], while others have shown a preference for broad consent [52]. The preference for broad consent among Australians was in uenced by whether the biobank is in Australia or overseas [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%