2010
DOI: 10.1177/0160323x10364748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Policy Diffusion of the State R&D Investment Tax Credit

Abstract: Since the first U.S. state adopted the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit in the early 1980s, the policy has spread to most of the other states. The diffusion continues with numerous modifications and enhancements to the basic R&D tax credit. This study examines the diffusion of the R&D investment tax credit using event history analysis supported by qualitative research. The conclusions of the research are that the R&D tax credit is an economic development approach associated with an existing manufactur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only could states “learn” from the experiences of others, but also the enactment of DC accounts in a neighboring state could help policy makers justify the proposal to the public—and to public employees. While the geographic proximity of states does not drive all new policy adoptions (Miller and Richard ; Mintrom and Vergari ), proximate states often exhibit congruent policy preferences (Bowman ; Gray ), and enactments in one state can lead to policy learning in one or more neighbors (Case, Hines, and Rosen ; Seljan and Weller ; Stream ), a process that may be affected by policy makers’ ideology (Grossback, Nicholson‐Crotty, and Peterson ). As a result of growing interconnectedness across governments, there is a declining belief that contagion effects are as strong today as they were previously (Shipan and Volden ); however, this study's time frame extends back to the mid‐1990s, and it is useful to seek evidence of peer‐driven enactments.
Theoretically, the probability of DC account enactment increases in a particular state if a neighboring state has already pursued the accounts.
…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only could states “learn” from the experiences of others, but also the enactment of DC accounts in a neighboring state could help policy makers justify the proposal to the public—and to public employees. While the geographic proximity of states does not drive all new policy adoptions (Miller and Richard ; Mintrom and Vergari ), proximate states often exhibit congruent policy preferences (Bowman ; Gray ), and enactments in one state can lead to policy learning in one or more neighbors (Case, Hines, and Rosen ; Seljan and Weller ; Stream ), a process that may be affected by policy makers’ ideology (Grossback, Nicholson‐Crotty, and Peterson ). As a result of growing interconnectedness across governments, there is a declining belief that contagion effects are as strong today as they were previously (Shipan and Volden ); however, this study's time frame extends back to the mid‐1990s, and it is useful to seek evidence of peer‐driven enactments.
Theoretically, the probability of DC account enactment increases in a particular state if a neighboring state has already pursued the accounts.
…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these experiments did not involve government employees in the workplace, their findings resonate with the cue‐taking, cooperative, and competitive behaviors that characterize policy decisions in state and local government (Baybeck, Berry, and Siegel ; Miller and Richard ). Furthermore, in the context of reactive transparency, governments—especially those that are subject to the same set of sunshine laws—often look to one another's decisions to assess legal precedence, as well as to evaluate the potential costs and benefits (e.g., Pasquier and Villeneuve ; Wang and Van Wart ) associated with request fulfillment.…”
Section: Peer Conformity In Reactive Transparencymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A state's initial adoption of a R&D tax credit is also correlated with observed state-level economic conditions (Miller and Richard, 2010).…”
Section: Computation Of Randd Tax Incentive Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%