2015
DOI: 10.1111/gove.12149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The “Parliamentary State” and the Empirical Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are in tune with Russell & Cowley (2016) who contend that parliamentary caucuses strengthening functionality of political organizations. Winetrobe (2000) explains that the Executive influence parliamentary policy debates on issues considered important to the ruling government.…”
Section: Parliament and Policy Scrutinysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The findings are in tune with Russell & Cowley (2016) who contend that parliamentary caucuses strengthening functionality of political organizations. Winetrobe (2000) explains that the Executive influence parliamentary policy debates on issues considered important to the ruling government.…”
Section: Parliament and Policy Scrutinysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, when ‗carrot and stick' disciplinary mechanisms are unavailable, leaders may also manipulate the agenda-setting process in order to avoid potentially divisive votes. Russell and Cowley (2016) argue that party leaders must take account of the preferences of non-median party members when deciding whether to pursue legislation. When the preferences of these veto players diverge, and a party leader can control the agenda, the degree of grid lock is likely to increase.…”
Section: Scholars Likementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we argue that Parliament remains an important site for policy influence. This judgement is based on numerous studies that reveal Parliament's policy influence (Russell and Cowley, 2016), specifically in scrutinising legislation (e.g. Thompson, 2015aThompson, , 2015b and examining government policy through select committee inquiry (e.g.…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%