1993
DOI: 10.1080/02508069308686151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Context of Conflict and Cooperation Over International River Basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important of these relate to countering hydro-hegemony as a preliminary to resolving water conflicts. Considerable attention is merited in exploring how the hydro-hegemony framework may support the devices of international water law such as customary international trans-boundary water law and human rights law (see especially Frey, 1993 andWolf, 2002). Anti-hegemonic resistance tactics such as the effect of time, of silence, the "cost of no agreement" and methods of issue de-securitization should also be explored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most important of these relate to countering hydro-hegemony as a preliminary to resolving water conflicts. Considerable attention is merited in exploring how the hydro-hegemony framework may support the devices of international water law such as customary international trans-boundary water law and human rights law (see especially Frey, 1993 andWolf, 2002). Anti-hegemonic resistance tactics such as the effect of time, of silence, the "cost of no agreement" and methods of issue de-securitization should also be explored.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be argued that control over water resources is not achieved through water wars but through a suite of power-related tactics and strategies. Groundbreaking contributions in this field include those of Frey (1993), Naff and Matson (1984), Gleick (1995), Lowi (1993), Homer-Dixon (1999) and Wolf (2002Wolf ( , 2004. Despite such interest, we feel that understanding remains incomplete and water conflict analysis has suffered from the under-consideration of two distinct and important theoretical issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a transboundary context, the first attempts to study how control of water resources is related to power dynamics were made by Fredrick Frey (1993), Peter Gleick (1993), and Miriam Lowi (1993. Gleick used the Euphrates River basin, and Lowi the Jordan River basin, to show how power is used to achieve political gains in transboundary negotiations (Menga, 2016).…”
Section: Role Of Power In Transboundary Water Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this branch of thought, the specific power distribution between riparian states reinforces or counterbalances geographical structures and has therefore been integrated in the set of explanatory factors for institutionalization as well (Frey 1993, Lowi/Rothmann 1993, Durth 1996, Amery/Wolf 2000, Dinar 2008): Depending on whether the power is concentrated in the hands of an upstream or a downstream state, a unilateral order will be maintained or IWTs will be signed and RBOs established. Lowi and Rothmann (1993) argue that cooperation is unlikely to take place if the upstream riparian is in a hegemonic position since it does not only have no interest in cooperating, but also possesses the necessary means to resist demands for cooperation from downstream states.…”
Section: The Constellation Of Actors In International Watercourses -Smentioning
confidence: 99%