2016
DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2016.1185011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis

Abstract: Many large-N cross-national studies claim to show that political institutions and phenomena determine where foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. In this paper, I argue that these studies tend to overemphasize statistical significance, and often neglect to assess the explanatory or predictive power of their theories. To illustrate the problem, I estimate variations of a statistical model published in an influential article on Political Risk, Institutions, and FDI. I find that none of the political variables t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between FDI flows and its determinants has generated a plethora of empirical papers. Whilst most of these research papers explore the host country's quality of institutions as determinants to be studied for FDI inflow (Sabir, Rafique, & Abbas, 2019;Tomelin, Amal, Hein, & Carpes Dani, 2018), other studies focused on determinants associated with political risk indicators of the host country (Arel-Bundock, 2017). However, these research papers' model specifications and empirical results are mixed and vary from one country to the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between FDI flows and its determinants has generated a plethora of empirical papers. Whilst most of these research papers explore the host country's quality of institutions as determinants to be studied for FDI inflow (Sabir, Rafique, & Abbas, 2019;Tomelin, Amal, Hein, & Carpes Dani, 2018), other studies focused on determinants associated with political risk indicators of the host country (Arel-Bundock, 2017). However, these research papers' model specifications and empirical results are mixed and vary from one country to the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, forests are grown by bootstrapping, creating samples based on drawing observations from the initial set of data, then randomly selecting subsets of predictors (or independent variables), and using them to create the nodes and the tree. In the end, a majority vote is taken among all of the grown trees, the ensemble prediction is calculated, and the final prediction corresponds to the most common predicted value in the trees (Breiman 2001;Arel-Bundock 2017). Another very useful feature of random forest is the lack of an implicit assumption of linearity in the relationships between predictors and the dependent variables, which increases its ability to identify meaningful links between variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow has been discussed by various researchers and it reflects the importance of FDI for economic development both at the regional level and the firm level (Arel-Bundock, 2017;Gasanova et al, 2017;Singh, 2021b). The decision of foreign inverstors on where to invest is based on various parameters, which leads to differences in FDI inflow at regional levels (Makojevic et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%