The Political Economy of Hydropower in the Communist Space: Iron Gates Revisited

Abstract

This paper proposes a critical discussion of the political economy of hydropower construction in the communist space. We use political economy, economic history and political ecology literature in order to reveal the economic and political relations in which hydropower is embedded in socialist states. The case analysed is the Iron Gates, a joint Romanian‐Yugoslav project which raises specific questions about the techno‐political framework of the new ‘hydraulic landscape’ and its place in socialist economies and societies. The case reveals important transformations in the political and economic relations within the Soviet bloc and provides a description of the complex institutional setting used in the construction of the hydropower system. In parallel, the paper explores the contribution of political power in the construction of the Iron Gates and especially its use in connection with the ideological production of the new communist regime.

Link between Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Economic and Financial Development in OECD Countries

“…They found that Beijing and Shanghai had the highest level of energy efficiency due to investments, and other parts of China had low energy efficiency by investments. The long-term impact of energy efficiency and sustainability on the population has been revealed by investigating the most significant projects in hydropower energy [48,49].…”

Fluctuating geographical position within a geopolitical and historical context: Case study: Romania

“…The Danube is not only a river that collects the whole inland drainage network of Romania, but also Europe's main navigable waterway, connecting Central Europe to the Black Sea basin, while the Danube-Main-Rhine and the Danube-Black Sea canal system constitute a true transcontinental navigable axis that links Constanţa harbour to the North Sea (Rotterdam). Its particular importance for Romania derives also from the fact that its territory is crossed by the Lower Danube sector (1,075 km, 38% of its total length), basically the most important section in terms of flow and navigation (Creţan, Vesalon, 2017& Văran, Creţan, 2018. Thus, as early as the Middle Ages, the Moldavian and the Wallachian rulers, succeeded in attracting the interest of King Napoleon the Third and of Queen Victoria, who used to call them "Danubian Princes", who supported the unification of all the territories inhabited by Romanians, into a powerful state at the mouths of the Danube, successfully capable of coping with the Russian expansion to the Bosphorus and the Dardaneles (Cazacu, 1999).…”

Challenges for Energy Transition in Poverty-Ridden Regions—The Case of Rural Mixteca, Mexico

“…A renewable energy transition in rural areas of low-income countries, where the affordability of electricity provides limited energy availability to its population, could offer an opportunity to mitigate poverty. Nevertheless, in many cases around the world, large energy projects are carried out without paying attention to the potential adverse impacts on poor people [14][15][16]. The provision of clean energy, as Burke [17] suggests, may also provide an improvement not only to basic services, but in job opportunities, additional sources of income, value added to renewable energy sources, and reductions in climate change impacts, among others.…”