1983
DOI: 10.2307/2644290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Economy of Land Reforms in Karnataka, A South Indian State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agrarian reforms implemented after independence (1954 Mysore Inams abolition Act; 1961 and 1974 Land Reform Acts) 61 had little impact on the tenure situation in the area. In fact, only the inam lands, which were officially abolished in 1955 in Karnataka, were redistributed to the tenants 61 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agrarian reforms implemented after independence (1954 Mysore Inams abolition Act; 1961 and 1974 Land Reform Acts) 61 had little impact on the tenure situation in the area. In fact, only the inam lands, which were officially abolished in 1955 in Karnataka, were redistributed to the tenants 61 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agrarian reforms implemented after independence (1954 Mysore Inams abolition Act; 1961 and 1974 Land Reform Acts) 61 had little impact on the tenure situation in the area. In fact, only the inam lands, which were officially abolished in 1955 in Karnataka, were redistributed to the tenants 61 . Lingayat farmers, who owned most of the land in the area, were little affected, and some of them even benefitted from the redistribution of inam lands, on which they were sharecroppers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From observations in this chapter, we see that Land reforms and deities 205 land transfers from landlords to tenants were not extensive in Perar, and as a result the existing system of land tenure was maintained on the whole, just as we saw in Chapter 9 when we examined the analyses of politico-economists on land reform in Karnataka (e.g. Thimmaiah & Aziz 1983;Pani 1984).…”
Section: Duties To the Kuṭuma And Pursuit Of Individual Rightsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Political economists, such as Thimmaiah and Aziz, classify the history of land reforms in Karnataka since independence into four periods, namely, 1947-1956: period from independence to reorganisation of the state; 1956-1971: period from reorganisation of the state to the period of the enactment of the Mysore Land Reforms Act;1971-1977 period of Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act and its compulsory enforcement; and period after 1977. They examine the contents and results of the land reforms in each period, focusing on the actions of interest groups (Thimmaiah & Aziz 1983, 1984a, 1984b. Let us take a look at the outline of the history paying special attention to South Kanara.…”
Section: Land Reform After Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using statistical data,Thimmaaiah and Aziz (1983) show this for villages and Manor for posts in the federal government(1977; 1978).8 Upon my return to Saundatti in 1988, I was surprised to learn of the appointment to the Trustee of a former minor temple attendant whose sole merit, according to rumor, is that he is the cousin of an important official of agricultural affairs of the city of Belgaum.at University of Manitoba Libraries on June 24, 2015 dio.sagepub.com Downloaded from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%