2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2316245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Economy of Public Employee Absence: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bureaucratic corruption is sometimes part of a more centralized scheme directed by politicians where politicians benefit financially or politically from low‐level bribery, as some portion of those bribes may be pushed up the chain to eventually benefit politicians' campaign or personal coffers (Brierley, 2020; Gingerich, 2013; Rose‐Ackerman, 1978). In other cases, street‐level bureaucrats are responsive to political pressure to deliver services to citizens (e.g., Callen et al, 2016), suggesting that politicians can exercise control over bureaucratic behavior. As a result, citizens may share the view of scholars like Gerring and Thacker (2004), who define political corruption as including not only the misuse of public office for private gain but also the acquiescence to such misuse by others (see also Rosas & Manzetti, 2015; Winters & Weitz‐Shapiro, 2016).…”
Section: Bureaucratic Corruption and Political Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bureaucratic corruption is sometimes part of a more centralized scheme directed by politicians where politicians benefit financially or politically from low‐level bribery, as some portion of those bribes may be pushed up the chain to eventually benefit politicians' campaign or personal coffers (Brierley, 2020; Gingerich, 2013; Rose‐Ackerman, 1978). In other cases, street‐level bureaucrats are responsive to political pressure to deliver services to citizens (e.g., Callen et al, 2016), suggesting that politicians can exercise control over bureaucratic behavior. As a result, citizens may share the view of scholars like Gerring and Thacker (2004), who define political corruption as including not only the misuse of public office for private gain but also the acquiescence to such misuse by others (see also Rosas & Manzetti, 2015; Winters & Weitz‐Shapiro, 2016).…”
Section: Bureaucratic Corruption and Political Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers conducted intervention at a BHU to watch public sector worker absenteeism using smart phone technology thereby virtually increasing the inspections of clinics. Health sector may sue this technology to monitor their employees [12]. This paper is an effort to highlight the need for public health awareness with a view to help public health sector in implementing health related programs with the support and understanding of the general public.…”
Section: Journal Of Asian Scientific Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employee absence is an important obstacle to organisational effectiveness across industries and settings (Krishnaswamy, 2019;Cikes, Maskarin Ribaric, & Crnjar, 2018;Zhang, Sun, Woodcock, & Anis, 2017). Empirical studies show that incentives matter for absence behavior (Mastekaasa, 2020;Callen, Gulzar, Hasanain, & Khan, 2013;Krishnaswamy, 2019), ".. in that more protected and difficult to monitor jobs show significantly higher levels of absenteeism: employees in public sector or in large firms, with permanent contracts or with longer tenure" (Scoppa, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%