2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1557-203x.2006.tb00077.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Potential of Civil Society: Advocating for Freedom of Information in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following section, I discuss two important variables explaining participation: effective alliance building and successful issue framing. 2 2 These arguments are also developed in previous studies [24][25][26].…”
Section: The State Of the Debatesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In the following section, I discuss two important variables explaining participation: effective alliance building and successful issue framing. 2 2 These arguments are also developed in previous studies [24][25][26].…”
Section: The State Of the Debatesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Clearly, each of these resources can be valuable. Yet because "there is no automatic equation by which group resources translate into political resources," simply identifying resources as correlates of influence omits a large part of the political story (Greenwald 1977, 333;Risley 2006a). More importantly, even CSOs with resource deficiencies can participate in policy making under some circumstances.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations Of Civil Society Participation In Pmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…National freedom of information acts were passed in Bolivia and Ecuador in 2004, and in Nicaragua in 2007. Although Argentina and Venezuela still lack national laws, the right to petition access to public information is recognized in their national constitutions (Risley, 2006). 9 Research has found that the enforcement of information laws is weak.…”
Section: Divided Civic Societymentioning
confidence: 99%