2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-008-9383-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The political trend in local government tax setting

Abstract: Political trend, Social interaction, Tax mimicking, D72, H71, H77,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Santolini (, ) introduced the idea of “social interactions” to explain tax mimicking. Politicians belonging to the same party interact with each other—socially rather than strategically—to draw inferences about party preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Santolini (, ) introduced the idea of “social interactions” to explain tax mimicking. Politicians belonging to the same party interact with each other—socially rather than strategically—to draw inferences about party preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the interaction may be the consequence of tax competition, where jurisdictions react to policies because they fear to lose tax base (Devereux et al, 2007;Ruiz and Gerard, 2008). Thirdly, fiscal interaction can be driven by a common political trend, where politicians sharing the same ideology would tend to mimic each other, without any electoral goal (Foucault et al, 2008;Santolini, 2008Santolini, , 2009). Finally, the interaction can be the result of political opportunism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they allow for interregional differences in spatial patterns using the fact that Belgian regions (Wallonia, Flanders and Brussels) differ on political, economic, linguistic and cultural dimensions, and find that the intensity of spatial interaction processes is higher within than between regions. Santolini (2008Santolini ( , 2009 Finally, other aspects of decentralized revenue raising efforts have been recently analyzed to uncover spatial patterns of competition. Allers and Hoeben (2010) and Rork (2009) test for competition in the setting of unit-based garbage pricing and toll revenues respectively.…”
Section: Tax Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%