2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781315777900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Abolition Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of our members also have a depth of experience of activism, some of which we have mentioned. In this sense, parallels can be drawn between the work of BCC and Norwegian KROM, which has successfully brought prisoners, former prisoners and non-con academics together on an equal footing for more almost 50 years (Mathiesen 2015). Naturally, a non-con academic cannot speak for someone about their prison experience.…”
Section: 'Criminology Activism'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of our members also have a depth of experience of activism, some of which we have mentioned. In this sense, parallels can be drawn between the work of BCC and Norwegian KROM, which has successfully brought prisoners, former prisoners and non-con academics together on an equal footing for more almost 50 years (Mathiesen 2015). Naturally, a non-con academic cannot speak for someone about their prison experience.…”
Section: 'Criminology Activism'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, academics seeking to do committed scholarship in ways that resist the institutionalizing tendencies of the academy would benefit from Thomas Mathiesen's notion of the “unfinished.” In discussing the politics of penal abolitionism, Mathiesen (:47) argues that “finishing” a resistant message or project (i.e., finalizing its form and its goals) renders it “destined to fail” and that “in the process of ‐nishing [sic] lies a return to the by‐gone.” Adopting an “unfinished” approach requires that the work remain in sketch form, meaning that the goals, message, and means are never finalized. Although specifically defined goals are often necessary along the way, they are considered small steps within a larger on‐going “unfinished” project.…”
Section: Lessons From Feminism and Symbolic Interactionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the “unfinished” maintains a relationship between long‐term revolutionary goals and short‐term reformist goals. Unfinished projects refuse definitive placement in either of these camps and therefore avoid “being ‘de[fi]ned out’ as irrelevant and ‘de[fi]ned in’ as undangerous” (Mathiesen :56). Resisting a “finished” project means that the actions taken cannot be subject to normative expectations.…”
Section: Lessons From Feminism and Symbolic Interactionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These paradigms are countered by the critical and cultural paradigm of criminology (for a recent summary of arguments, see Young 2011) in general. The particular cases of concern with disciplinarity include penal abolitionism (Ruggiero 2010;Mathiesen 2014) and a critical stance towards the industrialisation of crime control (Christie 1993), while biopolitical discourse is present in, for instance, critical discussions on the meaning of capital punishment (Garland 2010) and crimmigration (Franko Aas 2013;Franko Aas and Bosworth 2013). The ongoing nature of these debates mean that there is a need for the scrutiny of disciplinary and biopolitical aspects of power and their influence on social relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%