2011
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2011.540441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of aspiration: neo-liberal education policy, ‘low’ parental aspirations, and primary school Extended Services in disadvantaged communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2012; Hall 2008, 2011; Hall and Appleyard 2011; Holdsworth 2009; Jeffrey et al. 2008; Taylor 2001; Warrington 2005; Waters 2006a,b, 2008; Xiang and Shen 2009); neoliberalisation (Gould 2000; Holloway and Pimlott‐Wilson 2011; Lewis 2005, 2011; Mitchell 2003; Olds 2007); postcolonialism (Jeffrey et al. 2004; Madge et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012; Hall 2008, 2011; Hall and Appleyard 2011; Holdsworth 2009; Jeffrey et al. 2008; Taylor 2001; Warrington 2005; Waters 2006a,b, 2008; Xiang and Shen 2009); neoliberalisation (Gould 2000; Holloway and Pimlott‐Wilson 2011; Lewis 2005, 2011; Mitchell 2003; Olds 2007); postcolonialism (Jeffrey et al. 2004; Madge et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Every Child Matters Green Paper (HM Treasury, 2003), for example, identified parenting as vital in shaping both positive and negative outcomes for children, a belief further evidenced in Alan Johnson's (then Secretary of State for Education) forward to Every Parent Matters (DfES, 2007a, page 3) where he stated " [p]arents and the home environment they create are the single most important factor in shaping their children's wellbeing, achievements and prospects." This belief led New Labour to overcome previous reticence about state involvement in parenting and to use parenting interventions to tackle both social exclusion and antisocial behaviour (James, 2009), tasking parents with inculcating both educational aspirations that would facilitate children's social inclusion as adult citizen-workers, and codes of conduct that would ensure current and future social stability (Holloway and Pimlott-Wilson, 2011). In this way, the roll-out neoliberalism of New Labour led to the development of a multifaceted parenting support agenda which spread across a range of Government Departments, including that with responsibility for education (Utting, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mothers’ cultural capital (Bourdieu 1986) is more likely to align with that required by the education system and their efforts work to the advantage of their own children, though not necessarily others in their child's school (Reay 2010; Landeros 2011; Lareau and Lopes 2012). Working class mothers, by contrast, have been shown to care equally (if differently) about their children's schooling (Holloway and Pimlott‐Wilson 2011; Hartas 2012) and to provide considerable levels of emotional support to help children survive school (Gillies 2006), but they are less likely to have the cultural, social, and economic capital which is required to interact with the education system (Hutchison 2012). Cross‐cutting class lines, parents of diverse ethnic majority and minority backgrounds have been shown to have very different relationships to parental involvement in schools (Huntsinger and Jose 2009; Vincent, Rollock et al 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%