The Politics of Distrust

John, Stephen

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44018-3_4

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Menurut Mustaqin dan Karla (2020) saat ini elemen pemerintah seringkali melakukan kesalahan terlepas dari niatan dan motif dibalik viralnya berbagai kesalahan yang sudah terjadi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi pemerintah pusat masih belum cukup baik sehingga sering terjadi kesalahpahaman antara pemerintah dan masyarakat yang kemudian dapat menyebabkan public distrust atau ketidakpercayaan publik (John, 2020). Ketidakpercayaan publik ini dimengerti sebagai akibat dari ketidakpekaan pada politik dalam arti makro dan mikro.…”

Section: Gambar 2 Tingkat Ketertarikan Dalam Memahami Isu Politik Mah...unclassified

Survei Pemetaan Isu Politik Indonesia Pada Mahasiswa Rekayasa Pertanian, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Ulfa,

Putri,

Prastianti

et al. 2021

DeCive

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini diintensikan untuk memetakan isu politik Indonesia yang ada pada mahasiswa rekayasa pertanian dengan menggunakan teknik survei. Situasi penelitian ini didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa mahasiswa berperan sebagai generasi yang memiliki kesadaran politik. Kesadaran politik dimengerti dalam aras dasar pemikiran ketatanegaraan dan sebagai wahana tindakan di ruang publik. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif deskriptif, yaitu pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan survei pemetaan pada para mahasiswa rekayasa pertanian di Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). Temuan penelitian didasarkan pada survei yaitu: ada dua pemetaan pada isu politik, yaitu dimensi pemahaman dan adanya dampak dari dimensi tersebut bagi mahasiswa rekayasa pertanian. Ada 88,2% dari keseluruhan responden memilih untuk mengikuti isu politk yang sedang ramai atau diminati saja, 7,4% tidak memahami isu politik yang terjadi mengikuti setiap isu politik dan 4,4% mengikuti setiap isu yang ada. Pemahaman pada isu politik mencakup politik keseharian ataupun politik dalam urusan ketatanegaaraan. Rekomendasi penelitian yaitu membuat platform yang mengemas isu politik menjadi menarik dan mensosialisasikan melalui media sosial.

show abstract

Section: Gambar 2 Tingkat Ketertarikan Dalam Memahami Isu Politik Mah...unclassified

Survei Pemetaan Isu Politik Indonesia Pada Mahasiswa Rekayasa Pertanian, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Ulfa,

Putri,

Prastianti

et al. 2021

DeCive

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, there are academics who dismiss these kinds of evaluative criteria as (for example) epistemically "lazy" 38 , "emotive" 39 , "irrational" 39 , "willfully ignorant" 40 , and "peculiar" 37,41 . This risks neglecting the social-ecological and cultural influences (including, for example, perspective, values, contextual relevance, and institutional trust) that impact public understandings of reliability 19 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health misinformation: protocol for a hybrid concept analysis and development

Pope,

Byrne,

Devane

et al. 2024

HRB Open Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Misinformation represents a serious and growing concern for public health and healthcare health; and has attracted much interest from researchers, media, and the public over recent years. Despite increased concern about the impacts of misinformation on health and wellbeing, however, the concept of health misinformation remains underdeveloped. In particular, there is a need to clarify how certain types of health information come to be designated as “misinformation,” what characteristics are associated with this classification, and how the concept of misinformation is applied in health contexts. Aim Developing a shared understanding of what it means for health information to be “misinformation” is an important first step to accurately identifying at-risk groups, clarifying pathways of vulnerability, and agreeing goals for intervention. It will also help to ensure that misinformation interventions are accessible, acceptable, and of benefit to the populations to which they are directed. We will therefore examine the characteristics, measurement, and applications of misinformation in health contexts. Methods We will undertake a hybrid concept analysis, following a framework from Schwartz-Barcott & Kim (2000). This framework comprises three phases: a theoretical phase, fieldwork phase, and final analysis phase. In the theoretical phase, a search of seven electronic citation databases (PsycInfo, socINDEX, JSTOR, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE and PubMed Central via PubMed, and ScienceDirect) will be conducted in order to identify original research, review, and theoretical papers, published in English between 2016 and 2022, which examine “health misinformation.” Data from the literature will be synthesised using evolutionary concept analysis methods from Rodgers (2000). In the fieldwork phase, a purposive sampling strategy will be employed to recruit stakeholders for participation in semi-structured interviews. Interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. The final phase will integrate findings from the theoretical and fieldwork analyses.

show abstract

Objectivity, shared values, and trust

Metzen

2024

Synthese

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper deals with the nature of trust in science. Understanding what appropriate trust in science is and why it can reasonably break down is important for improving scientists’ trustworthiness. There are two different ways in which philosophers of science think about trust in science: as based on objectivity or as based on shared values. Some authors argue that objectivity actually grounds mere reliance, not genuine trust. They draw on a distinction that philosophers of trust following Annette Baier have made with respect to interpersonal trust, where genuine trust has some normative element to it that is missing in cases of mere reliance. However, I will show that there are plural forms of trust in science: Both objectivity and shared values ground trust in science in a normative sense. I will link the trust in science debate to the literature on interpersonal trust. This is significant in that, beyond references to Baier, there is little connection between both areas of philosophy. In a pluralist reading, different trust accounts help to identify the normative elements involved in different kinds of trust in science.

show abstract

The Politics of Distrust

Cited by 6 publications

References 17 publications

Survei Pemetaan Isu Politik Indonesia Pada Mahasiswa Rekayasa Pertanian, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Survei Pemetaan Isu Politik Indonesia Pada Mahasiswa Rekayasa Pertanian, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Health misinformation: protocol for a hybrid concept analysis and development

Objectivity, shared values, and trust

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About