2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315680682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Education Policy in an Era of Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have long critiqued the neutral tone and positivist approach to policy research (Ching et al, 2018;Diem et al, 2014;Milani & Winton, 2017;Nakagawa, 2000;Taylor, 1997). Because the topic of this paper calls for a methodology and analytic tool embedded with a critical lens to carefully examine policy rhetoric and how it constructs the context for the Community Schools initiative, I use qualitative case study methods with Horsford, Scott, and Anderson's (2018) critical policy analysis (CPA) framework as a guide. Horsford, Scott, and Anderson (2018) suggest a critical policy analysis may: 1) Challenge traditional notions of power, politics, and governance, 2) examine policy as discourse and political spectacle, 3) center the perspectives of the marginalized and oppressed, 4) interrogate the distribution of power and resources, and 5) hold those in power accountable for policy outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Scholars have long critiqued the neutral tone and positivist approach to policy research (Ching et al, 2018;Diem et al, 2014;Milani & Winton, 2017;Nakagawa, 2000;Taylor, 1997). Because the topic of this paper calls for a methodology and analytic tool embedded with a critical lens to carefully examine policy rhetoric and how it constructs the context for the Community Schools initiative, I use qualitative case study methods with Horsford, Scott, and Anderson's (2018) critical policy analysis (CPA) framework as a guide. Horsford, Scott, and Anderson (2018) suggest a critical policy analysis may: 1) Challenge traditional notions of power, politics, and governance, 2) examine policy as discourse and political spectacle, 3) center the perspectives of the marginalized and oppressed, 4) interrogate the distribution of power and resources, and 5) hold those in power accountable for policy outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars refer to this as a "discursive strategy," or the intentional use and/or manipulation of language to generate a particular outcome (Anderson & Donchik, 2016;Reisigl & Wodak, 2015;Wright, 2012). One central reason Horsford, Scott, and Anderson (2018) suggest we view policy as discourse and socially constructed is because policies are not created to respond to a problem. Rather, existing "solutions" are chosen to address problems as they arise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations