“…Scholars have long critiqued the neutral tone and positivist approach to policy research (Ching et al, 2018;Diem et al, 2014;Milani & Winton, 2017;Nakagawa, 2000;Taylor, 1997). Because the topic of this paper calls for a methodology and analytic tool embedded with a critical lens to carefully examine policy rhetoric and how it constructs the context for the Community Schools initiative, I use qualitative case study methods with Horsford, Scott, and Anderson's (2018) critical policy analysis (CPA) framework as a guide. Horsford, Scott, and Anderson (2018) suggest a critical policy analysis may: 1) Challenge traditional notions of power, politics, and governance, 2) examine policy as discourse and political spectacle, 3) center the perspectives of the marginalized and oppressed, 4) interrogate the distribution of power and resources, and 5) hold those in power accountable for policy outcomes.…”