The literature from the past year covered a range of themes including environmental history, crosscultural connections, gender history, legal culture, and memory studies. We begin with gender. Emily Winkler's assessment of AEthelflaed, ruler of Mercia in the early tenth century, challenges scholarly understanding of female power in this period. She argues persuasively that modern scholarship needs to distinguish between grammatical gender in Latin and gendered language. There are many examples of women ruling as lords where concerns about their gender do not arise in the sources. Of greater note to these women's contemporaries were practical matters such as their wealth, presence, and foreign relations. Winkler demonstrates that later historians, including the influential writers of history in twelfth-century England, were enamoured with AEthelflaed because of the nature of the challenges that she faced. She dismisses suggestions that they saw a link between AEthelflaed and Empress Matilda (1102−67) because they were both women, and argues that it was AEthelflaed's triumphs for Mercia, not her gender, that separated her from other rulers. Alex Traves also considers royal women in his analysis of early medieval royal genealogies in Asser's Life of King Alfred. He argues that the two genealogies of royal women included by Asser -concerning Alfred's mother and wife -performed an important political function for Alfred's dynasty. Alfred used his ancestry to justify ruling an enlarged kingdom: his mother, Osburh, helped in asserting his rights over recent additions to Wessex, and his wife, Ealhswith, gave Alfred's son, Edward (and indeed his daughter AEthelflaed, see Winkler), a legitimate claim to rule in Mercia. Traves concludes that male royal genealogies were concerned with tracing the origins and legitimacy of a dynasty's authority, while female genealogies were focused on narrower and perhaps more pressing political objectives.Georgina Pitt turns her attention to Alfred the Great, asking why his elites supported his vast system of defence by constructing the burghal network in the ninth century. Through an analysis of the material record of fortifications, alongside the sparse entries in the textual record (Asser's Life of Alfred and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle), and using assemblage theory and social practice theory, she argues for the close connection between Alfredian ideology and military reform. Alfred was a good Christian king who led and protected his people, and those who obeyed him were protected; in contrast, the people who disobeyed his orders, for example, to construct burhs, were