The Politics of Isolation: Refused Relation as an Emerging Regime of Indigenous Biolegitimacy

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This essay describes the politics of voluntary isolation, an emerging category of indigeneity predicated on a form of human life that exists outside of history, the market, and wider networks of social connection. It traces a recent controversy around one such “isolated” population—Ayoreo-speaking people in the Paraguayan Gran Chaco—to suggest how these politics of isolation may represent a new regime of what Didier Fassin has called “biolegitimacy,” or the uneven political parsing and authorization of valid human life, within global formations of indigeneity. Here, I identify how international human rights law, multiculturalist state policies, humanitarian NGO programs, and genetic science all share an investment in the moral defense of isolated life. I explore how this investment may divide the kind of humanity authorized or claimed as “indigenous” into opposing legitimacies that are set against one another and vertically ranked. The essay argues that what is at stake in this process is not merely a new technique of the self or the enduring romance of the primitive, but the redistribution of the meaning and value assigned to those domains of human life imagined in opposition to social relation itself.</jats:p>

The lightness of existence and the origami of “French” anthropology

“…Descola provides occasion to think again with the Achuar, at a time when we are beginning to have a number of breakthrough new ethnographies of Amazonia. I think here particularly of Lucas Bessire's work with the Paraguyan Ayoreo People-fromthe-Place-Where-the-Collared-Peccaries-Ate-Our-Gardens (Bessire 2012(Bessire , 2013(Bessire , 2014; of Eduardo Kohn's work with the Runa of Ecuador (Kohn 2013); and that brilliant Yanomami text by Davi Kopenawa, translated and annotated by Bruce Albert (Kopenawa and Albert 2013), which begins with a very contemporary ecological call wrapped in an ancient anaconda or harpy eagle's skin, "The forest is alive. The white people (the ghosts, those who speak strange languages) persist in destroying it.…”

The Returns of Recognition: Ngarinyin Experiences of Native Title, Encounter and Indeterminacy in the Kimberley Region of Northern Australia

“…In spite of changes to Aboriginal personhood, landed‐identities continue to be the primary marker of indigeneity across a number of settler nations including Australia (Merlan :304; Trigger and Martin ). The vesting of social and cultural capital in remote places feeds romantic discourses that reproduce the idea that authentic Aboriginal selves are located in remote Australia (Bessire :470). Yet, as other scholars describe for Aboriginal people in various parts of Australia, the attenuation of connections to country has had a range of impacts, particularly on cosmologies and personhood more generally (Burbidge ; Glaskin , ; Kearney ; Vincent ).…”

Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique

“…For those who dare to classify such things, sustained avoidance by Ayoreo of direct contact and their proximity to “traditional lifeways” would presumably make these people and their worldviews exceptionally close to exteriority and “nonmodern ontology.” Yet long‐term fieldwork revealed that precisely the opposite was the case. Rather, this was a situation in which rupture and transformation had become key moral values through practical and ontological attunement to a variety of competing projects: nonsensical violence, rampant environmental devastation, humanitarian NGOs, neoliberal economic policies, soul‐collecting missionaries, and tradition‐fetishizing ethnographers (Bessire , ). In this context, a self‐conscious decision to abandon the mythic ordering of the universe as immoral made logical sense even as it created new axes of subordination and dispossession aimed against these “ex‐primitives” whose ties to legitimating alterity were suddenly refused, impossible, or suspect (Bessire ).…”