2015
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2014.952823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Time on the Frontline: Street Level Bureaucracy, Professional Judgment, and Public Accountability

Abstract: This article reports on a study carried out on the impact of quality assurance mechanisms -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, several studies noted the effect of New Public Management reforms on professionals (Farrell and Morris ; Noordegraaf and Steijn ) and some authors have argued that rising bureaucratic burdens have made the work of public professionals more demanding (Burton and Van den Broek ). In this respect, Travers () argued that the development of more extensive mechanisms of quality assurance has led to a “new bureaucracy”, especially in the public sector where professionals “in areas such as education, health, and social work [are] under increasing pressure to evidence accountability to the public and the public purse” (Murphy and Skillen , p. 633).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, several studies noted the effect of New Public Management reforms on professionals (Farrell and Morris ; Noordegraaf and Steijn ) and some authors have argued that rising bureaucratic burdens have made the work of public professionals more demanding (Burton and Van den Broek ). In this respect, Travers () argued that the development of more extensive mechanisms of quality assurance has led to a “new bureaucracy”, especially in the public sector where professionals “in areas such as education, health, and social work [are] under increasing pressure to evidence accountability to the public and the public purse” (Murphy and Skillen , p. 633).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, the street-level or "front line" of policy implementation acquires renewed importance (Lipsky, 1980;Maynard-Moody & Musheno, 2003;Murphy & Skillen, 2015). These frontline PSOs will have to excel in the detection and correction of errors and problems in policy implementation, in reflecting on and inquiring into the effects of policy experiments, and in flexibly adapting policies in response to that.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussion: Toward A Post-npm Public Sector?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to a growing literature on "gaming" in the public sector (Noordegraaf & Abma, 2003;Van Thiel & Leeuw, 2002), identifying a variety of dysfunctional and perverse effects of quantitative management control. Examples are additional bureaucracy, information overload, tunnel vision, short term thinking and planning, risk avoidance, fixation on measures, symbolic compliance and impression management, and a general lack of system responsibility, especially when several organizations contribute to public performance (e.g., De Bruijn, 2002;Diefenbach, 2009;Frey et al, 2013;Groot, 1999;Moynihan, 2005;Murphy & Skillen, 2015;Osborne et al, 2015;Pidd, 2005;Smith, 1995;Teelken, 2012;Townley, Cooper & Oakes, 2003;Van Dooren, 2011;Verbeeten, 2008;Verbeeten & Spekle´, 2015;Walker & Van der Zon, 2000).…”
Section: New Public Management In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being established regimes with stable power relations and role expectations, developed democracies continue to struggle over the definition of legitimate accountability regimes (Olsen, ). Although NPM has initially emphasized social and democratic accountability (i.e., encouraging citizens to hold public officials and service providers accountable and viewing the patient as a consumer and/or as a reform overseer), its definition depends on the chosen normative perspective (Lewis, O'Flynn, & Sullivan, ), be it democratic (the people/users it serves; Murphy & Skillen, ), constitutional (preventing abuses of public authority), or managerial (effectiveness and quality of services; Bovens, Schillemans, & Hart, ). These approaches, however, are context‐relevant (Witesman & Walters, ) and, therefore, will rank differently across countries.…”
Section: New Public Management Accountability and The Democratic Rementioning
confidence: 99%