1992
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90364-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The polymerase chain reaction: an epidemiological tool to differentiate between two clusters of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains

Abstract: A primer set designed to amplify the enterotoxin (yst) gene of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains generated two different electrophoretic profiles of the target sequence when a collection of strains of worldwide origin was screened. Serovars O:1,3; O:2a,3; O:3; O:5,27 and O:9, known as European strains, produced a 200-bp fragment that matched the size of the target sequence. However, serovars O:4,32; O:8; O:13a,13b; O:20 and O:21, known as American strains, generated two fragments of 1.4 and 1.6 kb. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average corrected sequence dissimilarity value between strains of these two subgroups is 1.2%, but is less than 0.5% within each of the subgroups. The phylogenetic splitting of this species is supported by several reports in the literature which indicate both genotypic and phenotypic diversity exists among Y. enterocolitica strains [23][24][25]. Studies have been initiated to confirm the phylogenetic results using both DNA-DNA similarity studies and other genotypic and phenotypic markers (Ibrahim and co-workers, in preparation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The average corrected sequence dissimilarity value between strains of these two subgroups is 1.2%, but is less than 0.5% within each of the subgroups. The phylogenetic splitting of this species is supported by several reports in the literature which indicate both genotypic and phenotypic diversity exists among Y. enterocolitica strains [23][24][25]. Studies have been initiated to confirm the phylogenetic results using both DNA-DNA similarity studies and other genotypic and phenotypic markers (Ibrahim and co-workers, in preparation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In addition to the evaluation of the multiplex PCR assay performed on a number of strains from our culture collection (Tables 1 and 2) and in contrast to the approach of Weynants et al (35), we tested the multiplex PCR on isolates (uncharacterized) obtained in the present study from yersiniosis patients and pork meat (Tables 4 and 5). Several investigators have described multiplex PCR assays for Y. enterocolitica, some for detection (applied to enrichment media) (3,25) and others for identification (applied to pure cultures) (20,22). When the former strategy is used, however, problems with PCR inhibitors are often encountered, and an additional sample preparation step prior to the PCR is required (30).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of MLEE to study genetic heterogeneity of Y. enterocolitica-like species has also led to important observations. A single strain, each of Y. intermedia, Y. frederiksenii, Y. mollaretii and Y. kristensenii [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] gave distinctive electrophoretic type. These electrophoretic types were quite different from those of Y. enterocolitica [7].…”
Section: Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%