The polymerization efficiency of a bulk-fill composite based on matrix-modification technology

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the polymerization efficiency of a matrix-modified bulk-fill composite, and compare it to a conventional composite which has a similar filler system. The degree of conversion (DC%) and monomer elution were measured over different storage periods. Additionally, fillers' content was examined. Materials and Methods Cylindrical specimens were prepared, in bulk and incrementally, from Filtek Bulk Fill (B) and Filtek Supreme XTE (S) composites using a Teflon mold, for each test ( n = 6). Using attenuated total reflection method of Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy, DC% was measured after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, elution of hydroxyethyl methacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and bisphenol-A glycidyl dimethacrylate was measured after 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days. Filler content was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Results There was no significant difference in DC% over different storage periods between B-bulk and S-incremental. Higher monomer elution was detected significantly from S than B. The elution quantity and rate varied significantly over storage periods and between different monomers. SEM images showed differences in fillers' sizes and agglomeration between both materials. Conclusions Matrix-modified bulk-fill composites could be packed and cured in bulk with polymerization efficiency similar to conventional composites.

Comparative Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins: Knoop Microhardness, Diametral Tensile Strength and Degree of Conversion

“…Among the modifications proposed by the manufacturer, different monomers were developed and incorporated into its composition, such as the high molecular weight aromatic dimethacrylate (AUDMA), capable of increasing the rigidity of the polymer chain formed. 28 On the one hand, a more rigid chain increases the resistance of the material, 29 which may also have contributed to the higher values of DTS. On the other hand, it decreases the number of reactive groups on the organic matrix and hinders their mobility during the polymerization reaction.…”

Effect of Aging of Orthodontic Aligners in Different Storage Media on Force and Torque Generation: An in vitro Study

“…Furthermore, when the polymer sheets are stored in water, the water is absorbed by diffusion, allowing the water molecules to get between the polymer chains, which facilitates their movement. With increasing temperature, the mobility of the polymer molecules also increases, leading to changes in the material [20,[29][30][31].…”

Comparison between bond strength of lithium disilicate with preheated composite, flowable composite and resin cement

“…viscous composite has higher filler content than flowable composite that makes it better in mechanical properties, wear resistance, higher hardness and lesser in polymerization shrinkage (7)(8)(9)(10) . In addition, viscous composite contains high molecular weight monomers that increases the conversion degree and decrease polymerization shrinkage (19,20) . It is found that mechanical properties of 60 °C preheated viscous composites are considerably better after curing (21) .…”