2021
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10060778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Population Diversity of Candidate Genes for Resistance/Susceptibility to Coronavirus Infection in Domestic Cats: An Inter-Breed Comparison

Abstract: Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is a complex pathogen causing feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). Host genetics represents a factor contributing to the pathogenesis of the disease. Differential susceptibility of various breeds to FIP was reported with controversial results. The objective of this study was to compare the genetic diversity of different breeds on a panel of candidate genes potentially affecting FCoV infection. One hundred thirteen cats of six breeds were genotyped on a panel of sixteen candidate genes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we have recently identified variable positions of CDS of these three genes in 154 purebred or stray domestic cats (Felis catus). 45,46 Interestingly, ratios of non-synonymous (NS) to synonymous substitutions (SS) followed the same trend observed for PRF1 (8 NS vs. 12 SS), GZMA (2 NS vs. 3 SS) and GZMB (3 NS vs. 2 SS) in the Felidae panel. In this context, an assessment of PRF1, GZMA and GZMB withinspecies polymorphism in three wild felid populations is our future task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we have recently identified variable positions of CDS of these three genes in 154 purebred or stray domestic cats (Felis catus). 45,46 Interestingly, ratios of non-synonymous (NS) to synonymous substitutions (SS) followed the same trend observed for PRF1 (8 NS vs. 12 SS), GZMA (2 NS vs. 3 SS) and GZMB (3 NS vs. 2 SS) in the Felidae panel. In this context, an assessment of PRF1, GZMA and GZMB withinspecies polymorphism in three wild felid populations is our future task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Nonetheless, this information may also be useful for the interpretation of within‐species polymorphisms and their associations with immune‐related phenotypes. For example, we have recently identified variable positions of CDS of these three genes in 154 purebred or stray domestic cats ( Felis catus) 45,46 . Interestingly, ratios of non‐synonymous (NS) to synonymous substitutions (SS) followed the same trend observed for PRF1 (8 NS vs. 12 SS), GZMA (2 NS vs. 3 SS) and GZMB (3 NS vs. 2 SS) in the Felidae panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The observed variation of NCR1 raises questions about its functional importance. In our previous studies, an NCR1 SNP was associated with a greater risk of persistent fecal shedding and with a higher load of Feline Enteric Coronavirus (FECV) particles in domestic cats 16,36 . Persistent shedders represent an important epidemiological risk not only for FECV infection, but also for Feline Infectious Peritonitis caused by a mutant FECV biotype 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our previous studies, an NCR1 SNP was associated with a greater risk of persistent fecal shedding and with a higher load of Feline Enteric Coronavirus (FECV) particles in domestic cats. 16,36 Persistent shedders represent an important epidemiological risk not only for FECV infection, but also for Feline Infectious Peritonitis caused by a mutant FECV biotype. 37 Interestingly, the susceptibility-associated allele was detected in all felid species examined here.…”
Section: The Diversity Of Ncr Genes In Domestic Catsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Consensus sequences were determined by bcftools (v1.11). 37 The bioinformatic analysis of Illumina data was performed as described in our previous paper, for details see Bubenikova et al 2021. 38 Briefly, preprocessing included use of FastQC (v. 0.11.5) and Trimmomatic (v. 0.36).…”
Section: Bioinformatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%