1947
DOI: 10.2307/211194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Population of the Soviet Union: History and Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lorimer was part of the same group of demographers as Coale at the Office of Population Research at Princeton University. Between 1944 and1958, the argument against rapid population growth was made in a remarkable collection of books stimulated by the Office of Population Research (Barclay 1954, Davis 1951, Kirk 1946, Lorimer 1946, Moore 1945, Notestein et al 1944, Smith 1952, Taeuber 1958.…”
Section: The Background: Demographic Change In the Latter Half Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorimer was part of the same group of demographers as Coale at the Office of Population Research at Princeton University. Between 1944 and1958, the argument against rapid population growth was made in a remarkable collection of books stimulated by the Office of Population Research (Barclay 1954, Davis 1951, Kirk 1946, Lorimer 1946, Moore 1945, Notestein et al 1944, Smith 1952, Taeuber 1958.…”
Section: The Background: Demographic Change In the Latter Half Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once economic growth resumed, inequality returned to a relatively low level by international standards. (Lorimer, 1946) to nearly 100 percent by the time of the country's independence in 1991. Education in Soviet times was free at all levels, including higher education (Mertaugh, 2004).…”
Section: Transition and Education In Kyrgyzstanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mao Cetung byl dostatečně svérázným a nezávislým vůdcem, aby si komunistická Čína mohla časem vytyčit vlastní cestu respektující čínská specifi ka a ofi ciální ideologii. 17 Například ve srovnání se Stalinovou koncepcí hrál v Mao Ce-tungových úvahách poněkud odlišnou a obecně důležitější roli agrární sektor. V souladu s Mao Ce-tungovými plány se sice čínští ekonomové nejvíce věnovali industrializaci, na druhou stranu zemědělství nemělo primárně sloužit jako zdroj fi nančních prostředků pro industrializaci, jak tomu například bylo v době prvního pětiletého plánu v SSSR.…”
unclassified