2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Position of the Bipolar Cup Reflects the Direction of the Hip Contact Force Acting on It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal was to bring the fracture line perpendicular to the direction of the joint reaction force, which was around 16 degrees in the frontal plane according to a previous study. [10] The shearing force at the fracture site could therefore be converted to a compression force during weightbearing. The osteotomy was of a staggered shape with asymmetrical limbs, the short limb being closer to the lateral side in order to preserve more bone on the lateral wall for secure xation of the DHS.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to bring the fracture line perpendicular to the direction of the joint reaction force, which was around 16 degrees in the frontal plane according to a previous study. [10] The shearing force at the fracture site could therefore be converted to a compression force during weightbearing. The osteotomy was of a staggered shape with asymmetrical limbs, the short limb being closer to the lateral side in order to preserve more bone on the lateral wall for secure xation of the DHS.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recorded a decrease in bipolar cup angle along the investigation period, so the study underlines the long time effect of the self centering mechanism. Based on these measurements, a 16 degrees loading angle in frontal plane was determined [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of bipolar HA, it has been shown that the cup rotates to a relatively constant horizontal position after weight bearing, which is attributed to the overall effect of different factors such as joint geometry, muscle action, soft tissue, and metal-on-bone friction [ 4 , 16 , 17 ]. Even though the importance of this balanced position for the clinical outcome remains unclear, it might be possible that arthritic changes of the acetabulum, with central osteophytes in particular, result in an aberrance of the head position and lead to restricted range of motion or hip pain [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%