2020
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2020.1806988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The possibilities and problematics of student voice for teacher professional learning: lessons from an evaluation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schools where students felt they were listened to about classroom practices reported higher grades, better attendance, and lower rates of chronic absenteeism. International researchers are agreed that student opinions about instruction, relevance of curriculum, tutoring, teacher development, and Internet learning opportunities deserve increased attention for school improvement (Conner, 2022;Cook-Sather, 2020;Jones & Bubb, 2021;Mayes, Black, & Finneran, 2021;Messiou et al, 2022;P. S. Strom, R. D. Strom, Sindel-Arrington, & Wang, 2022).…”
Section: Student Voice Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schools where students felt they were listened to about classroom practices reported higher grades, better attendance, and lower rates of chronic absenteeism. International researchers are agreed that student opinions about instruction, relevance of curriculum, tutoring, teacher development, and Internet learning opportunities deserve increased attention for school improvement (Conner, 2022;Cook-Sather, 2020;Jones & Bubb, 2021;Mayes, Black, & Finneran, 2021;Messiou et al, 2022;P. S. Strom, R. D. Strom, Sindel-Arrington, & Wang, 2022).…”
Section: Student Voice Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviewed criticisms of student evaluations of teachers in the literature highlight how student perception surveys are embedded in neoliberal discourses and correspond to various practices that can demoralise teachers (Perry-Hazan 2019) while at the same time, as innocent as the informal conversations may be, 'it would be difficult for anyone not to be influenced by pupil reports of poor teaching' (Page 2015(Page , 1042 and these informal conversations could, even unintentionally, act as a form of surveillance. It is the contention of this paper, that of the classroom-level consultations and managementlevel consultations taking place in Irish schools, it is the former that should be prioritised and focused on, once it does not represent 'a move away from a model of professional autonomy where teachers make their own decisions about teaching quality' (Bragg 2007, 351) or a move to a construction of teachers as technicians (Mayes, Black, and Finneran 2021). In countries where student voice is still emerging and developing, it is likely that student voice focused on open and transparent dialogue between teachers and students devoid of any outside pressure or surveillance would be most beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critique of student voice scholarship has increasingly focused on how student voice practices may be co-opted to reinforce oppression rather than to focus on social justice (Balakrishnan & Claiborne, 2017; Holquist & Walls, 2021a; McNae & Cowie, 2017; Mayes et al, 2016, 2021; Bertrand & Rodela, 2018; York & Kirshner, 2015; Robinson & Taylor, 2013; Rodela & Bertrand, 2021). For example, Lac and Cumings Mansfield (2018) identified three levers for effective student voice in educational leadership: (a) positioning of students as change agents, (b) school administrators who support the centering of student voice, and (c) the actual creation of opportunities for student voice to occur.…”
Section: Student Voice As Critical Distributed Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%