1967
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60379-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Post-embryonic Developmental Stages of Cestodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classical definitions of cysticercoids and cysticerci, it has always been an essential characteristic whether fully-developed scoleces were invaginated or retracted, although these terms were used interchangeably by Wardle and McLeod (1952). In their reviews on cestode post-embryonic development, Voge (1967) and Šlais (1973) considered scolex retraction or invagination as prominent, key developmental features. Freeman (1973), on the other hand, did not include this character in his phylogenetic analysis because he considered the scolex as a labile structure, stating that "there is some evidence that the scolex of the metacestode may evert and retract as need be…" (Freeman 1973;p.…”
Section: Significance Of Scolex Invagination or Retractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classical definitions of cysticercoids and cysticerci, it has always been an essential characteristic whether fully-developed scoleces were invaginated or retracted, although these terms were used interchangeably by Wardle and McLeod (1952). In their reviews on cestode post-embryonic development, Voge (1967) and Šlais (1973) considered scolex retraction or invagination as prominent, key developmental features. Freeman (1973), on the other hand, did not include this character in his phylogenetic analysis because he considered the scolex as a labile structure, stating that "there is some evidence that the scolex of the metacestode may evert and retract as need be…" (Freeman 1973;p.…”
Section: Significance Of Scolex Invagination or Retractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Mead and Olsen (1971) reported that O. filaroides developed in the final host, the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum), directly without any second intermediate host. Voge (1967) also thought this was a typical pattern of Proteocephala including Ophiotaenia. It is regretted that in the next experiment, the development in other hosts were not successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…During the enteral period of its life, the worm exists as an adult that continu ally sheds segments ova-containing. Ova may be imbibed by its intermediate host, the pig, and develop into larvae (oncospheres and mctacestodes), which can exist in the paren teral environment or, if the egg is eaten di rectly by the human host, the worms behave the same as if they were in the intermediate host [3], Upon emerging from the egg, the hexacanth (6-toothed) larva penetrates the intestinal wall and travels via lymphatics and vascular system to muscles and central ner vous system [4, 5J. As the larva (or onco sphere) develops, it becomes the metacestode or cysticercus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%