2009
DOI: 10.3171/2008.12.spine08576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up

Abstract: Object This study details long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes following single-level posterior cervical foraminotomy for degenerative disc or osteophyte disease. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of 162 cases involving patients treated by a single surgeon using a posterior cervical foraminotomy. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
114
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
114
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Other than the two patients who required additional operations for adjacent-level disorders, only 3 of 42 patients reported a result worse than G/E (fair in all three cases), a success rate comparable with historical long-term PF data [24][25][26][27] and slightly better than those of ACD [19] or ACDF [12,28,29]. The PF is known to be a highly effective procedure for treatment of patients with cervical radiculopathy and results in long-lasting pain relief and improved quality-oflife outcomes in most patients in terms of motion preservation [27,30]. In addition, no significant segmental degeneration or disc space narrowing is seen in AF, but only very small changes in focal or segmental kyphosis and segmental angulation were reported [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Other than the two patients who required additional operations for adjacent-level disorders, only 3 of 42 patients reported a result worse than G/E (fair in all three cases), a success rate comparable with historical long-term PF data [24][25][26][27] and slightly better than those of ACD [19] or ACDF [12,28,29]. The PF is known to be a highly effective procedure for treatment of patients with cervical radiculopathy and results in long-lasting pain relief and improved quality-oflife outcomes in most patients in terms of motion preservation [27,30]. In addition, no significant segmental degeneration or disc space narrowing is seen in AF, but only very small changes in focal or segmental kyphosis and segmental angulation were reported [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Various anterior and posterior operative approaches for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy have been reported [5,7,8,11,13,16,25,27]. Scoville [23] firstly described posterior foraminotomy through a partial resection of the medial part of facet joint to relieve the compression of the cervical nerve root.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posterior approach of cervical disc was originally reported by Mixter [19], and the key-hole foraminotomy was subsequently popularized by Scoville, Epstein, and Fager [5,7,10,11,13,16,25,27]. Many reports noted the term laminoforaminotomy for management of paracentral and foraminal cervical disc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary complication with this procedure is neck pain, presumably secondary to muscle dissection [72]. Certain risk factors, such as advanced age, cervical kyphosis, and previous surgery may predispose patients to progressive degeneration and spinal deformity [73]. One of the most important limitations to the posterior surgery is the amount of bony decompression that can safely be achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%